Open ports.

Open ports.

Secure Home | Search | About
 Networking Firewalls    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Open ports. keving98 02-05-2005
`--> Re: Open ports. Jason Edwards02-05-2005
Posted by on February 5, 2005, 12:13 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I recently installed SBS 2000, including ISA 2000 and Exchange 2000, on
a clients server and I'm a little concerned about the fact that,
according to programs such as "Shields Up" (I do not want to instigate
a flame war about the merits of Shields Up however), a number of ports
are wide open. The client does run a mail server and uses Outlook Web
access so I presume that certain ports need to be open for their mail
to function properly.

My question is: how can I provide the maximum protection for my client
and still leave their mail server, etc... functional? I've installed
all the patches for ISA and Exchange. The ports that show as "open" on
"Shields Up" are 80; 110; 25; and 443. I know what these ports are
for. Can I, or do I need to, mask them from the internet? All of
these ports were open by default after installing SBS 2000.

I know Microsoft is part of the problem when it comes to security but
could the default configuration of ISA be dangerous?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Kevin G



Posted by Leythos on February 5, 2005, 8:13 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:13:22 -0800, keving98 wrote:

> I recently installed SBS 2000, including ISA 2000 and Exchange 2000, on
> a clients server and I'm a little concerned about the fact that,
> according to programs such as "Shields Up" (I do not want to instigate
> a flame war about the merits of Shields Up however), a number of ports
> are wide open. The client does run a mail server and uses Outlook Web
> access so I presume that certain ports need to be open for their mail
> to function properly.
>
> My question is: how can I provide the maximum protection for my client
> and still leave their mail server, etc... functional? I've installed
> all the patches for ISA and Exchange. The ports that show as "open" on
> "Shields Up" are 80; 110; 25; and 443. I know what these ports are
> for. Can I, or do I need to, mask them from the internet? All of
> these ports were open by default after installing SBS 2000.
>
> I know Microsoft is part of the problem when it comes to security but
> could the default configuration of ISA be dangerous?

When I setup mail servers and web servers for any client I never consider
ISA as a viable option - I don't want to trust the OS vendor to protect
the system. At the same time I don't want the system directly exposed to
the internet for any reason - an attack could significantly slow the
machine if nothing else.

You should get a cheap NAT device, they are going to be faster than your
internet connection so any NAT device would work. A simple NAT device with
only the necessary ports open inbound will prevent a lot of the scans that
hit your system - additionally, you can also (on some units) block
outbound to destination ports 135~139, 445, and 1433/1434.

As for port 80, if they are not running a web server exposed to the
public, disable port 80, or block it at the firewall (router). They should
be doing OWA over SSL (443) and not HTTP (80). You don't need 110 open
unless you are letting people PULL POP connections from outside - the
exchange server does not need 110 to work. So, as far as inbound, you only
need 443 and 25 inbound to the server.

If they want to use Outlook instead of OWA from home, setup the ability to
VPN into the server and let them access it over the VPN, don't use RPC
over HTTP.


--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me



Posted by Jason Edwards on February 5, 2005, 8:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> I recently installed SBS 2000, including ISA 2000 and Exchange 2000, on
> a clients server and I'm a little concerned about the fact that,
> according to programs such as "Shields Up" (I do not want to instigate
> a flame war about the merits of Shields Up however), a number of ports
> are wide open.
> The client does run a mail server and uses Outlook Web
> access so I presume that certain ports need to be open for their mail
> to function properly.
>
> My question is: how can I provide the maximum protection for my client
> and still leave their mail server, etc... functional? I've installed
> all the patches for ISA and Exchange. The ports that show as "open" on
> "Shields Up" are 80; 110; 25; and 443.

When I run shields up from my current location I find 25, 80 and 443 open
(but not 110 because I don't need it). It's been like that for four years
without problems.

> I know what these ports are
> for. Can I, or do I need to, mask them from the internet?

That would make it difficult to use outlook web acces (you do use SSL for
OWA, don't you?)
It would also make it difficult to receive incoming email.
It is likely that 110 does not need to be open to the Internet.

> All of
> these ports were open by default after installing SBS 2000.
>
> I know Microsoft is part of the problem when it comes to security but
> could the default configuration of ISA be dangerous?

I would run some more sophisticated tests against that box.
http://www.hackerwhacker.com/
would be a good start.

I don't recommend running Windows 2000 directly on the Internet.
Get an external firewall box and port forward 25,80,443 to your Windows 2000
box.

Jason

>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Kevin G
>




Similar ThreadsPosted
Open Ports on Router August 19, 2005, 10:02 pm
Which ports should be open for PcAnyWhere? October 18, 2005, 12:30 pm
Open ports on a cisco PIX 501 January 19, 2006, 8:19 am
ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0 open ports problem July 28, 2004, 10:35 pm
Packets not forwarded even though ports open February 28, 2005, 1:29 pm
Open ports on DMZ acces with CISCO PIX 515E February 8, 2005, 4:43 am
Minimum Ports open in a personal firewall July 30, 2005, 12:33 pm
Linksys Routers showing open UDP ports??? September 15, 2005, 6:07 pm
Sending a "ping": Which (ICMP) ports must be open in firewall to receive answer ? March 29, 2007, 10:28 am
Configure DCOM client to use only a small range of ports (instead of random ports) August 16, 2006, 4:43 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy