|
Posted by Gerald Vogt on February 28, 2008, 3:01 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> There is NOTHING wrong with Internet radio, from work, as
> long as it does not interfere with your work, and this one women
> in South Carolina happens to agree with me.
Of course it is wrong if you signed an employment contract which
prohibits you to circumvent the installed security devices like the
firewalls and which prohibits you to listen to internet radio or
similar at work place or even prohibits to do anything non work
related at your work place.
Circumventing the firewall does interfere with the work of the
company, with the security established. It does not matter whether it
affects the work of that person. If it does even worse. It does affect
network security of that company at any time and may even cost that
company extra money or cause other problems if those streams reduce
available bandwidth.
Gerald
|
|
Posted by Mr. Arnold on February 28, 2008, 4:31 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> There is NOTHING wrong with Internet radio, from work, as
> long as it does not interfere with your work, and this one women
> in South Carolina happens to agree with me.
Yeah, there is nothing wrong with it if the company has sanctioned it. But
it doesn't seem to be the case according to you. Or is that beyond your
comprehension? Yeah, and I have contracted in companies that do sanction it
and allow their employees to listen to Internet radio, but that's based on
the employee's job responsibilities. And I have been in companies that don't
sanction it period.
Why are you sitting up in this NG with the nonsense you are posting in front
of those who are concerned with security? It's not that employee's right to
circumvent that company's security.
You are totally ridiculous with a hypocritical mindset. What you have is an
ignorant home user state of mind. You remind me of that other lunatic who
was posting the same thing a couple of years ago.
That lunatic too was posting that he had some woman that was circumventing
company security, and they were in heavy correspondence, and a possible love
connection. <g>
Did you change your name? Was that you and now you're back with another
woman or the same woman? <g>
|
|
Posted by Leythos on February 28, 2008, 7:08 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > There is NOTHING wrong with Internet radio, from work, as
> long as it does not interfere with your work, and this one women
> in South Carolina happens to agree with me.
You don't have a right to determine that for the Business that is being
abused. If the company has stated no personal use or no-non-business
use, then the people either abide by that rule or are subject to
discipline.
Face it, you're just an unethical Liar.
--
Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
|
Posted by Chilly8 on February 28, 2008, 8:34 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
X-No-Archive: Yes
>> There is NOTHING wrong with Internet radio, from work, as
>> long as it does not interfere with your work, and this one women
>> in South Carolina happens to agree with me.
>
> You don't have a right to determine that for the Business that is being
> abused. If the company has stated no personal use or no-non-business
> use, then the people either abide by that rule or are subject to
> discipline.
>
> Face it, you're just an unethical Liar.
Well, like I said, I did have a lot of people in Hawaii, where it
was still the workday, tuned into the debate on my station,
and all the "free" listener slots did fill to capacity. I also had
quite a few more on my Shoutcast feed. Since my Shoutcast
server is not in any filtering lists, there was no need to circumvent
anything to listen on that. Since my Shoutcast server (if you
type in my addresses, instead of the Shoucast "referrer"
address) is not filtered, then there is NO violation of
company rules on programing that is simulcast on our
Shoutcast server, becuase is is currently NOT in ANY
filtering lists, which is likely why the majority of listeners
were listening on the Shoutcast feed. Beucase it is not
in any filter lists (I do check that often), and the filters fail to
block it, then the users are NOT BREAKING ANY
LAWS by listening from work. In short, becuase the
address for my Shoutcast server is not in any filtering lists,
a user cannot be prosecuted, criminally, for listening on the
Shoutcast server, as long as they use the direct address for
my server in either Windows Media Player, Winamp, or
whatever player is installed on the machine. I have a select
amount of programming that is broadcast on Shoutcast,
though that is mostly talk and sports shows. They can
simply go to my web site (also NOT in any block lists
on any of the major filter vendors), click the Shoutcast
listen live link (when a particular program is being aired on
Shoutcast) and they are good to go, no circumvention,
no muss, no fuss.
|
|
Posted by Gary on February 28, 2008, 12:53 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
starting forwarding every chain letter and urban legend that's ever been
debunked by Snopes. Please stop feeding the troll, people.
-Gary
|
|
XML site map