Newest Proxies - April 23

Newest Proxies - April 23
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 Networking Firewalls    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Newest Proxies - April 23 John 04-23-2008
Posted by Sebastian G. on April 23, 2008, 7:09 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Flash Gordon wrote:


> Even on the cheapo Draytek Vigor 2950 load balancer all I had to do was
> check the box to say we were using a URL white list and people could
> *only* access the web sites we had explicitly allowed and then there was
> no need to update it to block the new proxies. Oh, and I also check the
> box telling it to forbid browsing by IP address.


I hope you made sure that all clients only use HTTP 1.1 or you force PROXY
CONNECT or a Socks proxy onto them. At any rate, resolving hostnames to IP
addresses on a regular basis shouldn't be that hard either.

> This is with a *cheap* device I can set it up in 5 minutes so that it
> *never* needs updating to block new proxies since it does not allow
> people to access anything they are not explicitly allowed to access.


Your argument still fails to address Chilly8's pure denial of reality. But
don't mind, I don't think there's any way to do this.

Posted by Flash Gordon on April 24, 2008, 3:01 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Sebastian G. wrote, On 24/04/08 00:09:
> Flash Gordon wrote:
>
>> Even on the cheapo Draytek Vigor 2950 load balancer all I had to do
>> was check the box to say we were using a URL white list and people
>> could *only* access the web sites we had explicitly allowed and then
>> there was no need to update it to block the new proxies. Oh, and I
>> also check the box telling it to forbid browsing by IP address.
>
> I hope you made sure that all clients only use HTTP 1.1 or you force
> PROXY CONNECT or a Socks proxy onto them. At any rate, resolving
> hostnames to IP addresses on a regular basis shouldn't be that hard either.

The client machines are pretty well locked down and the user community
is pretty ignorant.

Also the manager often looks over peoples shoulders or remote connects
to their desktops to see what they are doing (especially when he is not
in the office). Not an environment I would like to work in, but I only
provide them with the odd bit of IT support.

Another thing that Chilly won't believe is that a lot of my companies
customers have there networks locked down so well we have to use our 3g
cards to access our email and when we manage to sell them our hosted
services we have to tell them the relevant IP addresses so that
appropriate holes can be opened in their firewalls (this even applies to
small companies).

>> This is with a *cheap* device I can set it up in 5 minutes so that it
>> *never* needs updating to block new proxies since it does not allow
>> people to access anything they are not explicitly allowed to access.
>
> Your argument still fails to address Chilly8's pure denial of reality.
> But don't mind, I don't think there's any way to do this.

True, very true.
--
Flash Gordon

Posted by Chilly8 on April 24, 2008, 7:31 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

X-No-Archive: Yes


>
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>
>> In article <98cc8ccc-7ba1-482a-a359-
>> ebaeae2f378f@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, jimonight@gmail.com says...
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/daily_ip
>>> http://www.assban.com
>>> http://www.aplusproxy.com
>>> http://www.btwproxy.com
>>> http://www.afastway.com
>>> http://www.myspaceproxyindex.com
>>
>> None of them work from any of my networks or customers network, and we
>> didn't have to do anything to block them....
>
> Most businesses are reliant on commercial filtering products that will
> not have these proxies in their filter lists for a few days. That is what
> one guy hawking 8e6's proxy dectector says. He says that without
> his product on your network, you are NEVER going to keep up
> with the flood of new php, cgi, and other public proxies appearing
> on the net every day.
>
> This is why I see traffic to my web sites coming from different proxies
> every day. Existing proxies are blocked, and new ones come in to
> take their place.


I have a couple of other producers that have approached me about
adding their shows to the station lineup, becusae they know I will
do everything I can, to make sure their shows are heard
ANYWHERE, including at work. There is another '80s show
that has approached me about airing their program, as well
as a show that features '70s and early '80s disco music.

I also have one producer, in Shenzen China, wanting to put
his program of "Canto-Pop" music on my station, targeting
Chinese expats in countries like Australia, Britain, and the
United States.

My reputation of doing everything possible to foil filtering
and blocking is starting to become well-known.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Newest Proxies January 8, 2008, 6:51 am
Newest Myspace Proxies March 14, 2008, 9:24 am
SANE 2006 early registration deadline is April 7, 2006 March 30, 2006, 6:38 am
New Proxies October 30, 2007, 1:40 am
New proxies November 6, 2007, 7:23 am
New proxies November 9, 2007, 10:30 pm
i need proxies April 22, 2008, 8:53 pm
Websense and Proxies February 1, 2005, 1:26 am
blocking web proxies May 23, 2006, 4:34 pm
New and fast proxies October 17, 2007, 9:19 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy