Firewall suggestion

Firewall suggestion

Secure Home | Search | About
 Networking Firewalls    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Firewall suggestion vani 02-16-2008
Posted by Sebastian G. on February 17, 2008, 1:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Casey wrote:


>> If you want to run outdated software that will no longer receive any
>> security updates, that is.
>>
>> cu
>> 59cobalt
>>
> Nowdays, it amazing how many users want the latest upgradable
> software with the ever increasing amount of features which are
> used to help sell the product.
>
> From what I've seen, Sygate is complete within itself and doesn't
> grow old with age.


Disclosed security vulnerabilities not being fixed by the vendor isn't
growing old? You must be kidding!

Posted by Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers on February 17, 2008, 2:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> usenet-2008@planetcobalt.net
> says...
>>> ivan.svaljek!MAKNI!@email.t-com.hr says...
>>>> What firewall do you suggest that only does firewalling and keeps
>>>> itself off of spyware, virii and other security jurisdictions (and
>>>> most of all, does its job well)?
>>>
>>> Sygate 5.6 3408
>>
>> If you want to run outdated software that will no longer receive any
>> security updates, that is.
>
> Nowdays, it amazing how many users want the latest upgradable
> software with the ever increasing amount of features which are
> used to help sell the product.
>
> From what I've seen, Sygate is complete within itself and doesn't
> grow old with age.

Because now that the program is no longer supported it has become
totally impossible that anyone could ever find a security hole in it ...

Just like nobody would ever be able to exploit a design flaw like, say,
running interactive services with elevated privileges.

Any irony found in here may be kept by the finder, BTW.

> In Sygate, the user builds all the rules and can make changes as
> required. Here are the functions which can be used in combinations to
> build each rule.
> Allow/Block, Host Address, Ports 1-65535, Protocols TCP, UDP,
> ICMP, Direction In/Out/Both, Scheduling, Applications.

*cough*GRE*cough*IGMP*cough*L2TP*cough*

> I believe you will find that these are all the parameters one would
> require to control operation of their computer on internet--this
> of course disregards getting malware infections.

I on the other hand believe that you still don't have the slightest clue
about IT security.

cu
59cobalt
--
"If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
--Mark Russinovich

Similar ThreadsPosted
Need suggestion July 24, 2006, 11:33 pm
Suggestion wanted March 29, 2007, 5:21 pm
Norton 2005 Internet Worm Protection (Firewall) or Windows XP native firewall? December 11, 2004, 11:19 am
[Newbie alert!] Is the Linksys BEFSX41 hardware Firewall/router a "real" firewall? March 25, 2005, 11:12 am
firewall synchronization not properly working on RainWall/CheckPoint's firewall cluster April 13, 2006, 10:24 am
SP2 Windows Firewall : Can the values of Firewall Settings be read from the Registry? November 6, 2007, 9:10 am
Firewall-1 Licensing Counting Each Interface of Firewall as a Separate Host February 13, 2008, 1:19 am
Firewall (cheap) that supports PPTP inbound to firewall July 30, 2004, 7:53 pm
Email Firewall - MXtreme Mail Firewall May 24, 2005, 11:15 am
If I Have a Firewall Router Do I Need a Software Firewall? October 24, 2005, 9:06 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy