|
Posted by Leythos on November 10, 2006, 8:53 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>=20
> Leythos skrev:
> > pau_zathrus@hotmail.com says...
> > > I=B4m running a X500 and monitoring the CPU shows a common use betwee=
n
> > > 80-90 %.. Is that normal?
> > > It doesnt matter if there is one or 100 Clients.. its allways up ther=
e.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > No idea - it really depends on what solution you built.
> >
> > Most of the WG firewalls we have installed, all over the USA/India, run
> > about 20%, sometimes a burp to 30%, but that's about it.
> >
> > Maybe you need to look at what you built, why you selected such a low-
> > level (entry level) firewall, and if it was the proper solution for you=
r
> > needs.
>=20
> Behind is a Ws5000 Wireless Switch with 9 AP300 Access Point and a
> variation og 10- 130 Mobile Units. (Laptops with Wireless access). On
> the outside is a FiberOptic 10-20 Mbit connection.
> Short on the Firebox config.
> For 30 Users there is free (any out) access.
> The rest only has Http allowed.=20
> Thats it..=20
> Yss:=20
> PaU
Based on what you've shown above, it would seem that you've bought to=20
little appliance for your solution.
Would it be correct to assume that you're using routed mode (NAT)=20
instead of Drop-In mode.
When you say Mobile units, are you talking about Mobile VPN users?
It really appears as though you bought to small an appliance for the=20
solution you were building.
--=20
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
| 
XML site map