|
Posted by B.J. on December 28, 2007, 5:01 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Try it (since it is free) and then you will see what im talking about. It is
so simple, and after configuring protect your computer in a ultimate way.
|
|
Posted by Sebastian G. on December 28, 2007, 5:18 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
B.J. wrote:
> Try it (since it is free) and then you will see what im talking about. It is
> so simple, and after configuring protect your computer in a ultimate way.
I tried it and found it impossible to configure even the simplest standard
rules (like filtering for TCP states), it's trivially vulnerable to various
DoS condition, and heck why does it even hook functions that are totally
unrelated to network functionality?
As far as I can tell, you're a spammer advertising people to install this
malware.
|
|
Posted by B.J. on December 28, 2007, 10:32 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options As far as i can tell you are retard who does not know how to use keyboard,
and mouse. You are nothing but a liar, if you tryed firewall, than you would
see that tpc states can be configured in rules tab. Goddamn liar.
|
|
Posted by Sebastian G. on December 29, 2007, 5:01 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options B.J. wrote:
> if you tryed firewall, than you would
> see that tpc states can be configured in rules tab.
So far I only found TCP flags there. I haven't found any way to refer to
actual TCP states anywhere, neither does the documentation tell anything.
Can you show me a configuration equivalent to the IPFW memo:
1 check-state
1 allow tcp from me to any out setup keep-state
1 allow tcp from any to any established keep-state
1 allow tcp from any to any frag keep-state
2 deny tcp from any to me 1-1023 in setup
3 allow tcp from any to me in setup keep-state
?
(Aside from that, just due to the trivial vulnerability to various DoS
conditions no serious person would ever consider using this horribly broken
software.)
|
|
Posted by Mellowed on December 31, 2007, 4:42 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
You have lost any credibility and with it your firewall.
> As far as i can tell you are retard who does not know how to use keyboard,
> and mouse. You are nothing but a liar, if you tryed firewall, than you
> would
> see that tpc states can be configured in rules tab. Goddamn liar.
>
>
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | What about Filseclab? | September 15, 2005, 5:42 pm |
| Norton Personal Firewall | July 21, 2004, 6:41 pm |
| Jetico Personal Firewall | August 10, 2004, 5:16 pm |
| Bug in Jetico Personal Firewall | November 29, 2004, 1:40 am |
| Sygate personal firewall | December 11, 2004, 5:28 am |
| Please help with Sygate Personal Firewall | February 20, 2005, 12:59 pm |
| Norton Personal Firewall | March 30, 2005, 4:24 pm |
| jetico personal firewall | April 21, 2005, 2:29 pm |
| Kensington Personal Firewall | June 20, 2005, 1:36 pm |
| personal firewall suggestions | November 14, 2005, 9:05 pm |
|