|
Posted by on August 23, 2007, 9:23 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I forgot to mention... this is a 3400j model
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:20:46 -0400, me@me.com.no.sspam wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Our organization has been having the most difficult time getting a
>Cyberguard TSP with load director to load-balance properly. We are at
>the latest patch 6.4.2 and we've had all kinds of problems. For one,
>we've seen frames arrive at the interface of the firewall but the
>firewall does not pick it up even though the destination MAC address
>matches that interface's MAC address. Because the packets don't make
>it to the CPU, there's no log of it. It is NOT a firewall rule issue
>and this issue happens when load-balancing is turned off ... it is an
>ad-hoc problem which means we have slow connectivity .. TCP
>retransmissions.
>
>Second issue we have is that the firewall, after upgrading to 6.4.2 is
>no longer load-balancing properly. When load-balancing is turned on,
>our mail server queue loads up to 5,000 messages because they cannot
>get out. When we turn off load-balancing, everything is fine.
>
>They've been a real pain in the butt. We're thinking of dumping them
>and possibly going with a Sidewinder seeing they run on BSD as opposed
>to Linux (which is what Cyberguard runs on).
>
>Anyways, I was wondering if anyone else has run into these type of
>issues with these firewalls....... I've got management to deal with
>and these issues are making me look bad (even though it has nothing to
>do with me).
>
>FYI... I never picked these firewalls to begin with...
| 
XML site map