|
Posted by jayscott1@gmail.com on October 4, 2006, 8:39 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options That's what I was afraid of. I was hoping there was an easier way.
Thanks
Andrew Rossmann wrote:
> [This followup was posted to comp.security.firewalls and a copy was sent
> to the cited author.]
>
> jayscott1@gmail.com says...
> > We are having issues with people trying to connect from home. If they
> > connect directly into their DSL the VPN works great, but if they
> > connect from behind a router then they will connect but are unable to
> > use the network. I'm sure that the problem is because our network at
> > the office is a 192.168.1.0 network and the home networks are the same.
> > I'm sure that this isn't an uncommen problem. Does anyone have a
> > quick solution for this?
>
> You need to change the range for one of the networks. Either change
> the one at work to 192.168.x.0 (where x is something other than 1), or
> the users need to go into their router setups and change theirs in a
> similar way. They can all use the same address, as long as it does not
> overlap with the corporate addressing.
>
> I use Sonicwall, but our corporate network uses 172.30.x.x for
> internal addressing. For various reasons, my DSL router (used when cable
> goes down) is 192.168.2.x, and my cable router is 192.168.3.x.
>
> This lists the range of 'private' addresses you can use that won't
> work on the real Internet:
> http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/privip.htm
>
> --
> If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
> All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
> law!!
> http://home.att.net/~andyross
|