CLI app - allow access?

CLI app - allow access?
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 Networking Firewalls    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
CLI app - allow access? karlengel 12-11-2006
Posted by on December 11, 2006, 1:58 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
ZA frquently tells me CLI Application (Command Line Interface) is
trying to access the trusted zone and I don't know whether to allow it
or not. Everything seems to be running OK without it. What sorts of
apps would this usually refer to? A little research indicated it's
related to Linux. Are some Windows apps built around Linux? I'm seeing
the window now with only the System Config window*, Word, ZoneAlarm &
Firefox open; in the tray LogMeIn is also enabled, there's my AV
running (Avast) and a Status Monitor for my Canon multifunction.

*The one that comes up after rebooting when you've changed some startup
items


Posted by Sebastian Gottschalk on December 11, 2006, 2:00 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
karlengel@excite.com wrote:

> ZA frquently tells me CLI Application (Command Line Interface) is
> trying to access the trusted zone and I don't know whether to allow it
> or not.

Then you should uninstall ZA. Which is generally a good idea if you want a
working system.

> Everything seems to be running OK without it. What sorts of
> apps would this usually refer to?

Well, you should know. It's your system!

> A little research indicated it's related to Linux. Are some Windows apps
> built around Linux?

Well, your _should_ know...

Posted by on December 11, 2006, 3:29 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> karlengel@excite.com wrote:
>
> > ZA frquently tells me CLI Application (Command Line Interface) is
> > trying to access the trusted zone and I don't know whether to allow it
> > or not.
>
> Then you should uninstall ZA. Which is generally a good idea if you want a
> working system.
>
> > Everything seems to be running OK without it. What sorts of
> > apps would this usually refer to?
>
> Well, you should know. It's your system!
>
> > A little research indicated it's related to Linux. Are some Windows apps
> > built around Linux?
>
> Well, your _should_ know...

Not surprising you didn't want that response archived!


Posted by Vanguard on December 11, 2006, 9:35 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
>> karlengel@excite.com wrote:
>>
>> > ZA frquently tells me CLI Application (Command Line Interface) is
>> > trying to access the trusted zone and I don't know whether to
>> > allow it
>> > or not.
>>
>> Then you should uninstall ZA. Which is generally a good idea if you
>> want a
>> working system.
>>
>> > Everything seems to be running OK without it. What sorts of
>> > apps would this usually refer to?
>>
>> Well, you should know. It's your system!
>>
>> > A little research indicated it's related to Linux. Are some
>> > Windows apps
>> > built around Linux?
>>
>> Well, your _should_ know...
>
> Not surprising you didn't want that response archived!


Except that a response that dupes their post completely undoes the
"X-no-archive: yes" header and why using that header is such a stupid
idea that only newbies think is effective, or maybe they hope no one
will respond to their post (and copy it in the reply).


Posted by Sebastian Gottschalk on December 11, 2006, 2:42 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Vanguard wrote:

> Except that a response that dupes their post completely undoes the
> "X-no-archive: yes" header and why using that header is such a stupid
> idea that only newbies think is effective, or maybe they hope no one
> will respond to their post (and copy it in the reply).

Or Google is stupid for actually interpreting such a header and censoring
their very own output, making themselves more unusable. D'oh, that's really
stupid.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Sonicwall Wireless Access - VPN and Guest Access April 5, 2007, 10:45 am
LAN access while VPN is up October 28, 2005, 1:07 am
Allow rdp access on pix 501 April 1, 2008, 4:54 pm
ZA blocks access to dns. Why? December 3, 2004, 10:29 am
School Access Help December 10, 2004, 8:10 am
Allow access from RAS CISCO PIX December 31, 2004, 10:24 am
Can't access Google March 16, 2005, 3:19 am
VPN access to second network. March 22, 2005, 4:26 pm
PIX 525: Restricting www access September 18, 2005, 11:11 am
Access List. September 22, 2005, 7:15 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy