share account #

share account #

Secure Home | Search | About
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
share account # SamIam 04-12-2007
Posted by Nick Lawrence on April 13, 2007, 12:59 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
station.

> I've got an account with three alarm panels in three seperate
> buildings, each calling out on different telephone lines, all
> reporting to one account number.

Posted by Jim on April 16, 2007, 11:31 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
> automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
> and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
> station.
>
>
>
My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
the numbers the accounts call in on.

This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
"ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
with it, I would have changed it.


Posted by Mark Leuck on April 17, 2007, 12:16 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> > One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
> > automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
> > and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
> > station.
> >
> >
> >
> My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
> the numbers the accounts call in on.
>
> This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
> "ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
> and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
> with it, I would have changed it.

Then why the "you wouldn't know cost savings" speech you just gave me? Had
you said this from the start it would be another story



Posted by Jim on April 19, 2007, 11:17 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
>
> > > One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
> > > automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
> > > and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
> > > station.
>
> > My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
> > the numbers the accounts call in on.
>
> > This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
> > "ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
> > and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
> > with it, I would have changed it.
>
> Then why the "you wouldn't know cost savings" speech you just gave me? Had
> you said this from the start it would be another story

Well, I wasn't aware that I needed to make sure you approved of it
before I did something.

Next time just assume I said fuck you, before you raise a question
about what I do and don't do, so that you don't have to waste time
posting.


Posted by Roland on April 19, 2007, 9:21 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>Well, I wasn't aware that I needed to make sure you approved >of it before
>I did something.

Or just bring a note from home and pin it on your shirt.

>>
>>
>> > > One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
>> > > automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
>> > > and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
>> > > station.
>>
>> > My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
>> > the numbers the accounts call in on.
>>
>> > This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
>> > "ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
>> > and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
>> > with it, I would have changed it.
>>
>> Then why the "you wouldn't know cost savings" speech you just gave me?
>> Had
>> you said this from the start it would be another story
>
> Well, I wasn't aware that I needed to make sure you approved of it
> before I did something.
>
> Next time just assume I said fuck you, before you raise a question
> about what I do and don't do, so that you don't have to waste time
> posting.
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Account worth May 11, 2008, 4:21 pm
Re: Add money to your Paypal account August 24, 2006, 10:06 am
ADT detailed account activity printout October 14, 2006, 4:23 pm
How to open a Swiss Bank account? February 27, 2008, 1:46 pm
Re: Add money to your Paypal account with OPRAH waUn] August 16, 2006, 12:31 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy