Wireless receiver - computer problem?

Wireless receiver - computer problem?

Secure Home | Search | About
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Wireless receiver - computer problem? Robertm 08-25-2005
Posted by Robertm on August 25, 2005, 8:25 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Just bought my Ademco wireless receiver. The literature says to avoid
interference, it shouldn't be put within 10 feet of a computer. Is this for
real? I have three computers in the house so I'd have to put the panel out
in the back yard. Don't tell me Polly was correct about wireless.

Bob




Posted by Jim on August 25, 2005, 9:25 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Robertm wrote:
> Just bought my Ademco wireless receiver. The literature says to avoid
> interference, it shouldn't be put within 10 feet of a computer. Is this for
> real? I have three computers in the house so I'd have to put the panel out
> in the back yard. Don't tell me Polly was correct about wireless.
>
> Bob

You've gotta live in a pretty small house.

It means, to put the receiver ........ that doesn't mean the main panel
..... away from any source of interference. Put it in a closet .... as
close to middle of the house as possible. Second floor ..... if
possible. Not being able to do that doesn't mean that you WILL have
problems. Just try to avoid it .... if possible. Also try to avoid
putting it or transmitters near large metal objects or mounting them ON
metal objects. Best thing to do is a test run. Pick a spot for the
receiver, take a transmitter and put it at each opening that you are
going to use a transmitter and trip the test unit. Look at the signal
strength. Do this for each opening. There's usually a couple of
locations at each opening that a transmitter can be mounted. A
difference of a few inches is usually sufficent to find acceptable
reception. If you have an unacceptable quantity of weak transmitters,
either change the location of the receiver (usually a foot or so will
do) or get a second receiver. For any home I do, of average size or
above, I always use two receivers. Saves from having to do too much
trial and error.

Likely you've got the opinion that wireless systems are just something
that you mount anywhere and they're going to work. It may, but chances
are, during the lifetime of the system, something is going to change at
your home that would throw a boarderline unit into the no reception
zone. It's better to make sure duing the initial installation that all
units are working at their best so that changes down the line wont
affect reliability. Doing any less is exactly the reason many
installers think that wireless systems are not reliable. They just
aren't willing to do what it takes to make it work.



Posted by Robertm on August 25, 2005, 12:36 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>
> Robertm wrote:
>> Just bought my Ademco wireless receiver. The literature says to avoid
>> interference, it shouldn't be put within 10 feet of a computer. Is this
>> for
>> real? I have three computers in the house so I'd have to put the panel
>> out
>> in the back yard. Don't tell me Polly was correct about wireless.
>>
>> Bob
>
> You've gotta live in a pretty small house.
>
> It means, to put the receiver ........ that doesn't mean the main panel
> .... away from any source of interference. Put it in a closet .... as
> close to middle of the house as possible. Second floor ..... if
> possible. Not being able to do that doesn't mean that you WILL have
> problems. Just try to avoid it .... if possible. Also try to avoid
> putting it or transmitters near large metal objects or mounting them ON
> metal objects. Best thing to do is a test run. Pick a spot for the
> receiver, take a transmitter and put it at each opening that you are
> going to use a transmitter and trip the test unit. Look at the signal
> strength. Do this for each opening. There's usually a couple of
> locations at each opening that a transmitter can be mounted. A
> difference of a few inches is usually sufficent to find acceptable
> reception. If you have an unacceptable quantity of weak transmitters,
> either change the location of the receiver (usually a foot or so will
> do) or get a second receiver. For any home I do, of average size or
> above, I always use two receivers. Saves from having to do too much
> trial and error.
>
> Likely you've got the opinion that wireless systems are just something
> that you mount anywhere and they're going to work. It may, but chances
> are, during the lifetime of the system, something is going to change at
> your home that would throw a boarderline unit into the no reception
> zone. It's better to make sure duing the initial installation that all
> units are working at their best so that changes down the line wont
> affect reliability. Doing any less is exactly the reason many
> installers think that wireless systems are not reliable. They just
> aren't willing to do what it takes to make it work.
>

Yep, small house 680 sq ft.

Bob




Posted by Crash Gordon on August 25, 2005, 5:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
You won't have a problem. just dont listen to -pullshoot...he's our resident
wackjob on rf.


>
>>
>> Robertm wrote:
>>> Just bought my Ademco wireless receiver. The literature says to avoid
>>> interference, it shouldn't be put within 10 feet of a computer. Is this
>>> for
>>> real? I have three computers in the house so I'd have to put the panel
>>> out
>>> in the back yard. Don't tell me Polly was correct about wireless.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> You've gotta live in a pretty small house.
>>
>> It means, to put the receiver ........ that doesn't mean the main panel
>> .... away from any source of interference. Put it in a closet .... as
>> close to middle of the house as possible. Second floor ..... if
>> possible. Not being able to do that doesn't mean that you WILL have
>> problems. Just try to avoid it .... if possible. Also try to avoid
>> putting it or transmitters near large metal objects or mounting them ON
>> metal objects. Best thing to do is a test run. Pick a spot for the
>> receiver, take a transmitter and put it at each opening that you are
>> going to use a transmitter and trip the test unit. Look at the signal
>> strength. Do this for each opening. There's usually a couple of
>> locations at each opening that a transmitter can be mounted. A
>> difference of a few inches is usually sufficent to find acceptable
>> reception. If you have an unacceptable quantity of weak transmitters,
>> either change the location of the receiver (usually a foot or so will
>> do) or get a second receiver. For any home I do, of average size or
>> above, I always use two receivers. Saves from having to do too much
>> trial and error.
>>
>> Likely you've got the opinion that wireless systems are just something
>> that you mount anywhere and they're going to work. It may, but chances
>> are, during the lifetime of the system, something is going to change at
>> your home that would throw a boarderline unit into the no reception
>> zone. It's better to make sure duing the initial installation that all
>> units are working at their best so that changes down the line wont
>> affect reliability. Doing any less is exactly the reason many
>> installers think that wireless systems are not reliable. They just
>> aren't willing to do what it takes to make it work.
>>
>
> Yep, small house 680 sq ft.
>
> Bob
>




Posted by Robertm on August 25, 2005, 7:57 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> You won't have a problem. just dont listen to -pullshoot...he's our
> resident wackjob on rf.
>
Yep, I was just having a little fun there. Sometimes I get bored with all
the Bass stuff and begin reflecting on some of the other interesting
characters.

Bob




Similar ThreadsPosted
Problem enrolling Receiver section of RF5501-433NA Keypad October 16, 2005, 7:30 pm
Wireless Security Receiver May 9, 2006, 2:07 pm
Problem with wireless alarm November 20, 2008, 10:10 pm
SK9500 CS Receiver September 3, 2007, 11:34 am
WTB: Surgard receiver - new January 24, 2008, 9:34 pm
Receiver Parts needed! April 25, 2006, 2:01 pm
FS: MCDI Alarm Receiver September 1, 2007, 3:06 pm
FS: MCDI Alarm Receiver September 12, 2007, 11:19 am
FS: MCDI Alarm Receiver January 2, 2008, 12:45 am
Computer Generated June 18, 2007, 9:22 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy