What is Brinks worried about?

What is Brinks worried about?
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
What is Brinks worried about? Frank Olson 10-23-2007
Posted by Frank Olson on October 23, 2007, 9:41 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Is it that the hand-held "Brinks Programmer" isn't really made by Brinks
and is available to anyone in the trade with access to the GE Security
line or are they concerned about the limited number of these units that
"float" around on eBay? Are they concerned that the court in Texas
might discover that they do indeed offer their equipment for sale (as
demonstrated by the proposal "Crash" put up) and which is contrary to
the statements put forth in Brinks Statement of Claim? Does Brinks not
download and "lock" the rebranded Ademco/Honeywell panels from local
programming (this would prevent someone from using the "*" and "#"
technique from gaining access to installer level programming)? I'd
really like someone from "Sableman and Company" (yes, I know you're
monitoring this Newsgroup) to actually identify the intellectual
property of Brinks publicly.

Posted by Jim Rojas on October 23, 2007, 12:08 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
This for starters...

http://comseccorp.com/_wsn/page2.html

Jim Rojas




Frank Olson wrote:
> Is it that the hand-held "Brinks Programmer" isn't really made by Brinks
> and is available to anyone in the trade with access to the GE Security
> line or are they concerned about the limited number of these units that
> "float" around on eBay? Are they concerned that the court in Texas
> might discover that they do indeed offer their equipment for sale (as
> demonstrated by the proposal "Crash" put up) and which is contrary to
> the statements put forth in Brinks Statement of Claim? Does Brinks not
> download and "lock" the rebranded Ademco/Honeywell panels from local
> programming (this would prevent someone from using the "*" and "#"
> technique from gaining access to installer level programming)? I'd
> really like someone from "Sableman and Company" (yes, I know you're
> monitoring this Newsgroup) to actually identify the intellectual
> property of Brinks publicly.

Posted by Frank Olson on October 23, 2007, 1:19 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Jim Rojas wrote:
> This for starters...
>
> http://comseccorp.com/_wsn/page2.html
>
> Jim Rojas


Hi Jim:

Would you know if Brinks would still be able to download their panel
with this "re-router" attached? If not, this unit itself would present
the biggest threat to their revenue stream. Does this mean that
companies like Brinks and ADT are going to go after any DIY store that
offers this unit for sale? Not only does this unit offer the clear
capability to "tortuously interfere" with *any* existing monitoring
contract, it also provides the customer that purchases a home with
existing equipment installed to have it monitored without even having to
contact Brinks. Yep... Sableman should be contacting the Hosting
Provider for http://www.comseccorp.com immediately.

Posted by Just Looking on October 23, 2007, 2:48 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>Sableman should be contacting the Hosting
>Provider for http://www.comseccorp.com immediately.

I don't think he would. Communications Security Corp probably has real
attorneys on staff and would actually not give him a chance to win by
default, or not win at all. Lawyers hate that almost as much as not getting
paid. Besides they've been around since 2003, certainly enough time by now
to have crossed swords with Brinks.

> Jim Rojas wrote:
> > This for starters...
> >
> > http://comseccorp.com/_wsn/page2.html
> >
> > Jim Rojas
>
>
> Hi Jim:
>
> Would you know if Brinks would still be able to download their panel
> with this "re-router" attached? If not, this unit itself would present
> the biggest threat to their revenue stream. Does this mean that
> companies like Brinks and ADT are going to go after any DIY store that
> offers this unit for sale? Not only does this unit offer the clear
> capability to "tortuously interfere" with *any* existing monitoring
> contract, it also provides the customer that purchases a home with
> existing equipment installed to have it monitored without even having to
> contact Brinks. Yep... Sableman should be contacting the Hosting
> Provider for http://www.comseccorp.com immediately.



Similar ThreadsPosted
brinks May 7, 2007, 6:51 pm
Brinks & The BBB September 20, 2007, 1:40 am
The Brinks PSA October 10, 2007, 9:58 am
PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com October 28, 2006, 10:55 pm
Brinks Sucks September 2, 2007, 7:30 pm
Re: Brinks Sucks September 2, 2007, 7:30 pm
It doesn't get any more blatant than this, Mr. Brinks-man! October 13, 2007, 4:02 pm
Actually it does get more blatant, Mr. Brinks-man!! October 14, 2007, 12:59 am
What's a Brinks 4000? October 17, 2007, 9:15 pm
What's with all the Brinks threads? October 19, 2007, 11:56 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy