The latest Brinkle in my life

The latest Brinkle in my life
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
The latest Brinkle in my life Frank Olson 11-02-2007
Posted by Frank Olson on November 2, 2007, 8:03 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
(Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
which I'm currently hosting at
http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm is far too "controversial"
for them. They have given me twenty-four hours to remove it, or they'll
cancel my account. I find it interesting that they are still unable to
point out where I've violated their terms of service other than
referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't provide much in the
way of information (although it is cleverly worded to "push" all the
right "buttons").

I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of
the Injunction against Jim. That program was called "Tech Help Beta".
The version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
what-so-ever. It does call them what they are and places them in the
correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than
the ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").

Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue. The
"prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
view as the "weaker link" in all this. You see... it's much easier for
a high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a
company that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry
"works". Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it
raises a few hackles in *all* the right places.

Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.

Posted by Bob La Londe on November 2, 2007, 8:11 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
> (Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
> which I'm currently hosting at
> http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm is far too "controversial"
> for them. They have given me twenty-four hours to remove it, or they'll
> cancel my account. I find it interesting that they are still unable to
> point out where I've violated their terms of service other than
> referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't provide much in the
> way of information (although it is cleverly worded to "push" all the
> right "buttons").
>
> I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of
> the Injunction against Jim. That program was called "Tech Help Beta".
> The version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
> what-so-ever. It does call them what they are and places them in the
> correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than
> the ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").
>
> Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue. The
> "prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
> view as the "weaker link" in all this. You see... it's much easier for
> a high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a
> company that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry
> "works". Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it
> raises a few hackles in *all* the right places.
>
> Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
> figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.

LOL. Gonna sue him in Canadian court?




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Posted by Frank Olson on November 2, 2007, 8:58 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Bob La Londe wrote:
>> After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
>> (Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
>> which I'm currently hosting at
>> http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm is far too "controversial"
>> for them. They have given me twenty-four hours to remove it, or they'll
>> cancel my account. I find it interesting that they are still unable to
>> point out where I've violated their terms of service other than
>> referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't provide much in the
>> way of information (although it is cleverly worded to "push" all the
>> right "buttons").
>>
>> I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of
>> the Injunction against Jim. That program was called "Tech Help Beta".
>> The version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
>> what-so-ever. It does call them what they are and places them in the
>> correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than
>> the ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").
>>
>> Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue. The
>> "prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
>> view as the "weaker link" in all this. You see... it's much easier for
>> a high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a
>> company that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry
>> "works". Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it
>> raises a few hackles in *all* the right places.
>>
>> Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
>> figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.
>
> LOL. Gonna sue him in Canadian court?


I'm sure as heck not going to post my strategy in a public forum. And
what, sir, is wrong with "Canadian Court"?

Posted by Bob La Londe on November 2, 2007, 9:47 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Bob La Londe wrote:
>> message
>>> After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
>>> (Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
>>> which I'm currently hosting at
>>> http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm is far too "controversial"
>>> for them. They have given me twenty-four hours to remove it, or they'll
>>> cancel my account. I find it interesting that they are still unable to
>>> point out where I've violated their terms of service other than
>>> referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't provide much in the
>>> way of information (although it is cleverly worded to "push" all the
>>> right "buttons").
>>>
>>> I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of
>>> the Injunction against Jim. That program was called "Tech Help Beta".
>>> The version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
>>> what-so-ever. It does call them what they are and places them in the
>>> correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than
>>> the ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").
>>>
>>> Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue. The
>>> "prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
>>> view as the "weaker link" in all this. You see... it's much easier for
>>> a high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a
>>> company that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry
>>> "works". Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it
>>> raises a few hackles in *all* the right places.
>>>
>>> Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
>>> figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.
>>
>> LOL. Gonna sue him in Canadian court?
>
>
> I'm sure as heck not going to post my strategy in a public forum.

Good.

> And what, sir, is wrong with "Canadian Court"?

Nothing, I was just thinking about the legal wrangling across international
boundaries.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Posted by Frank Olson on November 3, 2007, 10:55 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Bob La Londe wrote:

> Nothing, I was just thinking about the legal wrangling across international
> boundaries.


Heh. "Wrangling" aside, he might be able to "write off" a couple of
"visits" to Vancouver.

Similar ThreadsPosted
The latest Brinkle in Jim's life. November 1, 2007, 12:26 am
The latest Brinkle in Jim's life March 21, 2008, 1:44 pm
OT: "Spud life" August 13, 2005, 6:49 pm
LIVE LIFE August 30, 2005, 1:24 pm
INFO: The latest from Symantec - "Winfixer" December 6, 2005, 3:28 am
OT; latest tinfoil beanie technology July 14, 2006, 10:53 am
45. Professionals always say that the latest wireless alarm system June 26, 2005, 5:05 am
Talk about a life safety device January 12, 2007, 4:54 pm
Simons motion sensor battery life? November 13, 2007, 6:38 am
Humor: Recently Unearthed E-Mail Reveals What Life Was Like In 1995 June 4, 2006, 7:20 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy