Compact cheap

Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

Secure Home | Search | About
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Compact cheap "surveilance" camera bitsyboffin 06-26-2006
Posted by teflon nonstick on June 30, 2006, 2:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 30/6/06 19:00, in article qqcA84IXbWpEFwlK@newbrain.demon.co.uk,

> writes
>> I was referring to the audit trail provided by a card access system, not
>> surveillance.
>> js
>>
>>> writes
>>>> I was referring to this
>>>> "You are still making excuses for an intrusive surveillance system which
>>>> reduce the risk unlawful access and theft."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Might
>>>>> also be interresting to know who was there",
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> my attribution and quoting are accurate.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently not.
>>>
>>> See
>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/e76ada3e69ca8ec9>
>
> Surveillance
> € noun close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal.
>
> Observation
> € noun 1 the action or process of closely observing or monitoring. 2
> the ability to notice significant details. 3 a comment based on
> something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
>
> monitor
> € verb keep under observation, especially so as to regulate, record,
> or control
>
> Maybe you do not consider the "audit trail" to be "closely ...
> monitoring", I do; still you are a top poster.

Most of the content in most of the groups deteriorates to shit.

The bloke wanted to lock his fucking door, but this is what it ends up with
brain damaged wankers giving English lessons.

Get. A. Fucking. Life.


Posted by Prometheus on June 30, 2006, 6:59 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>On 30/6/06 19:00, in article qqcA84IXbWpEFwlK@newbrain.demon.co.uk,
>

he was advocating.

>> Surveillance
>> € noun close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal.
>>
>> Observation
>> € noun 1 the action or process of closely observing or monitoring. 2
>> the ability to notice significant details. 3 a comment based on
>> something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
>>
>> monitor
>> € verb keep under observation, especially so as to regulate, record,
>> or control
>>
>> Maybe you do not consider the "audit trail" to be "closely ...
>> monitoring", I do; still you are a top poster.
>
>Most of the content in most of the groups deteriorates to shit.

Given your choice of vocabulary I conclude that long words are beyond
did not understand advocating logging people who enter and exit is
surveillance. After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as
conversations do, perhaps people don't talk to you, otherwise you would
know this.

>The bloke wanted to lock his fucking door, but this is what it ends up with
>brain damaged wankers giving English lessons.

He has already been given advice, and acknowledged it; see my post
advocating using a PIR to release the door after a lack of movement for
fifteen minutes, turn off the lights; and even arm the alarm. The thread
has since drifted, as you shold have learned that conversations tend to.

>Get. A. Fucking. Life.

After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as conversations do;
I can understand why people don't talk to you.

Why are you so opposed to not using surveillance; knowing who left the
door open yesterday will not prevent last nights burglary, reprimanding
the person who left the door open in the honest belief that someone else
was there will not stop this honest mistake being made again, it might
drive honest fee paying members away.

Your evident level of education, and your preference for spying on
people makes me ask, are you a private security guard or perhaps a cop?
Maybe this is why people don't talk to you.

You
really
need
to
learn
the
art
of
conversation.

--
Ian G8ILZ

Posted by alarman on June 30, 2006, 7:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
And you need to learn to be honest with yourself.
js
>>On 30/6/06 19:00, in article qqcA84IXbWpEFwlK@newbrain.demon.co.uk,
>>
>
> was advocating.
>
>>> Surveillance
>>> ? noun close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal.
>>>
>>> Observation
>>> ? noun 1 the action or process of closely observing or monitoring. 2
>>> the ability to notice significant details. 3 a comment based on
>>> something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
>>>
>>> monitor
>>> ? verb keep under observation, especially so as to regulate, record,
>>> or control
>>>
>>> Maybe you do not consider the "audit trail" to be "closely ...
>>> monitoring", I do; still you are a top poster.
>>
>>Most of the content in most of the groups deteriorates to shit.
>
> Given your choice of vocabulary I conclude that long words are beyond you.
> understand advocating logging people who enter and exit is surveillance.
> After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as conversations do,
> perhaps people don't talk to you, otherwise you would know this.
>
>>The bloke wanted to lock his fucking door, but this is what it ends up
>>with
>>brain damaged wankers giving English lessons.
>
> He has already been given advice, and acknowledged it; see my post
> advocating using a PIR to release the door after a lack of movement for
> fifteen minutes, turn off the lights; and even arm the alarm. The thread
> has since drifted, as you shold have learned that conversations tend to.
>
>>Get. A. Fucking. Life.
>
> After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as conversations do; I
> can understand why people don't talk to you.
>
> Why are you so opposed to not using surveillance; knowing who left the
> door open yesterday will not prevent last nights burglary, reprimanding
> the person who left the door open in the honest belief that someone else
> was there will not stop this honest mistake being made again, it might
> drive honest fee paying members away.
>
> Your evident level of education, and your preference for spying on people
> makes me ask, are you a private security guard or perhaps a cop? Maybe
> this is why people don't talk to you.
>
> You
> really
> need
> to
> learn
> the
> art
> of
> conversation.
>
> --
> Ian G8ILZ



Posted by teflon nonstick on June 30, 2006, 8:12 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 30/6/06 23:59, in article lwmjaiS+yapEFwEo@newbrain.demon.co.uk,

>
> You
> really
> need
> to
> learn
> the
> art
> of
> conversation.

Seems you 'need' to show people how clever you are.

Conversation is a social thing, not a one way street - and what a boring
bastard you must be. I bet you're a complete cunt to live with.

By the way - I looked up 'expert' in my trusty copy of 'Thesaurus for
Dummies' and came up with 'posterior discharge'.

Work it out.


Posted by teflon nonstick on June 30, 2006, 8:51 pm