Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas

Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Jim Rojas 07-11-2007
Posted by Nomen Nescio on July 11, 2007, 11:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I hope you're lining up a lawyer for that hearing on Monday morning. If
you don't have one, Brink's is going to chew you up, spit you out, and
charge you for doing it.

The motion for default judgment is asking for damages of $2,561,100.
They'll probably get less than that, but it's still going to hurt you
badly. Since you live in Florida, you get to keep your house under the
O.J. principle (he owes the Goldmans $30 million, but they can't take his
house away). Otherwise, you may find yourself declaring bankruptcy.

The lawyers claim they've already spent $35,000 going after you, and they
want to send you the bill. You are not going to win this battle in the
court of public opinion, and you are not going to beat a team of lawyers by
yourself in federal court.

You are going to get crushed like a bug unless your lawyer can pull a
rabbit out of the hat by Monday morning. Do not ignore this, like you
ignored the original lawsuit. It isn't going to go away. It's only going
to get worse, unless you act right now.

- badenov


Posted by Frank Olson on July 12, 2007, 1:17 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Jim Rojas wrote:
> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
> online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>
> Read all about it.
>
>
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>
>
> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>
> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>
> Jim Rojas


Jim: What's the log-in ID and password? :-)

These guys are pure nutballs. Unfortunately they also have access to
practically limitless funds. Get yourself a good lawyer. Set up a
Paypal account (the official Jim
Rowhouse-because-needs-the-space-for-all-those-used-Brinks-panels legal
defense fund. I'm sure there are more than just a few of us who would
contribute. Good luck and best wishes.

Posted by Nick Lawrence on July 12, 2007, 2:01 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Ditto.
Nick

Frank Olson wrote:
> Jim Rojas wrote:
>
>> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a
>> small online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>>
>> Read all about it.
>>
>>
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>>
>>
>> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>>
>> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>
>
>
> Jim: What's the log-in ID and password? :-)
>
> These guys are pure nutballs. Unfortunately they also have access to
> practically limitless funds. Get yourself a good lawyer. Set up a
> Paypal account (the official Jim
> Rowhouse-because-needs-the-space-for-all-those-used-Brinks-panels legal
> defense fund. I'm sure there are more than just a few of us who would
> contribute. Good luck and best wishes.

Posted by Roland More on July 12, 2007, 10:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I certainly hope you have a strategy for fighting this action other than
posting here. As a practical matter you might not want to post that
information on this NG for Brinks to read of course. In case you've never
had the misfortune, I can tell you going into Federal Court is no small
thing. Perhaps you have consulted an attorney and are shocked at the amount
of retainer he or she wants for this case. Just guessing I wouldn't be
surprised if an experienced attorney wants up to 25K as a retainer to take
this on. (I don't think there are many attorneys that would want this pro
bono either). $25K is more than most have in their pay pal account I am
sure. (Guess what? Brinks isn't going to lose this by running out of cash).
If not that then what? You are going to pull a rabbit out of your hat? You
can't show up to court in a bunny suit and hope to hop around the issues. I
know several cop buddies that have been cited for contempt of court (and
served processing time) just for being late to court (with good reason). I
don't know what kind of show this judge runs, but it seems you haven't
gotten on her good side just yet. The Federal Courtroom is a very busy
place. The judge isn't going to slow down and take time to listen to a (pro
se) defendant bumble through an argument to make a point for the court to
act on. That is not how it works. From what you posted so far it is like
watching your execution in slow motion. I hope this thing somehow turns
around for you. Good luck.


> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
> online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>
> Read all about it.
>
>
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>
> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>
> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>
> Jim Rojas



Posted by George Siegle on July 12, 2007, 11:15 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have printed the Documents, Thank You.

When I show them on sales calls to people who have gotten a quote or talked
to Brinks it put an end to them wanted to deal with Brinks.

End users do not like the idea of having an alarm in their home that if they
sell the home it has no value to the resell of the home if it is not part of
the home and can not be used by the new owner unless they sign a contract
with Brinks.

Thanks Brinks for the help, and good luck Jim.

George Siegle


> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
> online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>
> Read all about it.
>
>
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>
> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>
> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>
> Jim Rojas



Similar ThreadsPosted
Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit July 6, 2007, 2:32 pm
3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas] November 30, 2007, 6:20 pm
PR: Brinks Home Security files Civil Suit against Jim Rojas & www.tech-man.com April 3, 2007, 10:10 pm
Brinks Home Security Complaints July 25, 2007, 7:59 pm
Brinks Home Security Directory July 25, 2007, 8:04 pm
Brinks Home Security System July 25, 2007, 10:38 pm
Brinks Home Security Rip Off Alerts September 2, 2007, 9:40 pm
Re: Brinks Home Security Rip Off Alerts September 3, 2007, 6:10 pm
Brinks Home Security Rip Off Reports March 28, 2008, 9:07 am
Re: Brinks Home Security Rip Off Reports March 28, 2008, 7:56 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy