Brinks Home Security Pays Off The Better Business Bureau

Brinks Home Security Pays Off The Better Business Bureau

Secure Home | Search | About
 CCTV, Alarms and other Physical Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Brinks Home Security Pays Off The Better Business Bureau Anonymous Sender 03-22-2008
Posted by Bob La Londe on March 27, 2008, 1:03 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> "Bob La Londe" wrote:
>>
>> So wouldn't falsely labeling other people's boxes weaken their claim on
>> their own boxes and certainly would weaken a claim like, "See it even has
>> our sticker on it."
>

> Nope. The fact that they are a sleazy, dishonest company taking advantage
> of their customers does not give other sleazy, dishonest companies the
> right to use the garbage that they own.

I think there might be one or two or a dozen legal precedents that disagree
with you on that, but hey that's the great thing about our legal system.
Its not about justice, but about who has the most money to do research and
find legal precedents to support their case. Few judges want to counter
another judges decision on the law. At best when that happens you can hope
an appellate judge will look at the law instead of the precedent.

A company can't claim, "We never sell our equipment," if somebody can prove
they do sometimes. They can't claim every panel with their name on it
belongs to them if they clearly can be proven to relabel other people's
panels.

Its not about proving ownership of a particular can, its about disproving
blanket generic statements about ownership to make the claim to that
particular can.

The onus of proof is on the accuser everytime. Individual judges have their
own prejudices and may weight decisions one way or another, but that doesn't
change the basic premise.

Of course when pairing all this crap with the FACT that people lie routinely
in this society to suit their own ends... Document Document Document...

"We spoke with the old company and we are cancelling with them properly." A
note goes on the contract to that effect before they sign it. Document
Document Document...

"Hey, Our old alarm company is claiming that's their equipment and that we
have to pay for it. We think this is your fault, and you didn't tell us.
You are an alarm co. You should know this."

Reply, "I told you everything that was possible, and you stated clearly that
you had taken care of it. Its on your contract. We even gave you a copy."

Document Document Document...

Anyway, Robert. The way things seem like they should be and the way things
are, are most definitely two different things. Your arguement has some
moral ground, but mine most definitely has legal ground. Yes, two wrongs
don't make a right, but nothing is ever always or never.


--
Sincerly,
The guy who makes the final decision
on who we do business with.
Bob La Londe

The Security Consultant
Bob La Londe - Owner
P.O. Box 5720
Yuma, Az 85366

(928) 782-9765 ofc
(928) 782-7873 fax

Licensed Contractor
ROC103044 & ROC103047





Similar ThreadsPosted
Business Plans Sample Template, Download Free Business Plan Workbook, Write a Business plan March 1, 2008, 3:44 am
Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas July 11, 2007, 9:56 pm
Brinks Home Security Complaints July 25, 2007, 7:59 pm
Brinks Home Security Directory July 25, 2007, 8:04 pm
Brinks Home Security System July 25, 2007, 10:38 pm
Brinks Home Security Rip Off Alerts September 2, 2007, 9:40 pm
Re: Brinks Home Security Rip Off Alerts September 3, 2007, 6:10 pm
Brinks Home Security Rip Off Reports March 28, 2008, 9:07 am
Re: Brinks Home Security Rip Off Reports March 28, 2008, 7:56 pm
Avoid Brinks Home Security March 29, 2008, 12:13 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy