netstat -a question

netstat -a question

Secure Home | Search | About
 Computer Software Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
netstat -a question Patrick Sullivan 07-19-2005
---> Re: netstat -a question Wolfman's Broth...07-21-2005
Posted by Patrick Sullivan on July 19, 2005, 4:39 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have been trying to figure out why this computer (Jim) has all these
ded.pacbell.net listeners in it. It's my boss's systenm, uses the same
connections I do, same software etc. But mine (w2005) looks more normal.
TIA!

Active Connections (in computer Jim)

Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP jim:epmap ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
TCP jim:microsoft-ds ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
TCP jim:1025 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
TCP jim:1026 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
TCP jim:10110 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
UDP jim:microsoft-ds *:*

Active Connections (in computer w2005)

Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP w2005:epmap w2005:0 LISTENING
TCP w2005:microsoft-ds w2005:0 LISTENING
TCP w2005:1025 w2005:0 LISTENING
TCP w2005:1026 w2005:0 LISTENING
TCP w2005:10110 w2005:0 LISTENING
UDP w2005:microsoft-ds *:*
UDP w2005:isakmp *:*

Patrick




Posted by Wolfman's Brother on July 21, 2005, 1:26 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Patrick Sullivan wrote:

> I have been trying to figure out why this computer (Jim) has all these
> ded.pacbell.net listeners in it. It's my boss's systenm, uses the same
> connections I do, same software etc. But mine (w2005) looks more normal.
> TIA!
>
> Active Connections (in computer Jim)
>
> Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
> TCP jim:epmap ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> TCP jim:microsoft-ds ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> TCP jim:1025 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> TCP jim:1026 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> TCP jim:10110 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> UDP jim:microsoft-ds *:*
>
> Active Connections (in computer w2005)
>
> Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
> TCP w2005:epmap w2005:0 LISTENING
> TCP w2005:microsoft-ds w2005:0 LISTENING
> TCP w2005:1025 w2005:0 LISTENING
> TCP w2005:1026 w2005:0 LISTENING
> TCP w2005:10110 w2005:0 LISTENING
> UDP w2005:microsoft-ds *:*
> UDP w2005:isakmp *:*
>
> Patrick

try the "-n" flag on the netstat command line. That'll show you the IP
addresses instead of the names, which might give you the clues you need.
My first guess would be that there's some oddiosity with the DNS.

How many network cards does the machine have?

What operating system are you using?

Chris
--
Minimal false-possitive packet matching for complex protocols with Linux
and IpTables .. http://www.lowth.com/rope



Posted by Patrick Sullivan on July 22, 2005, 12:38 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Using Win2k on both machines, no NICs, just modems. I'll see what -n says
tomorrow, thanks.


> Patrick Sullivan wrote:
>
> > I have been trying to figure out why this computer (Jim) has all these
> > ded.pacbell.net listeners in it. It's my boss's systenm, uses the same
> > connections I do, same software etc. But mine (w2005) looks more normal.
> > TIA!
> >
> > Active Connections (in computer Jim)
> >
> > Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
> > TCP jim:epmap ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> > TCP jim:microsoft-ds ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> > TCP jim:1025 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> > TCP jim:1026 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> > TCP jim:10110 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
> > UDP jim:microsoft-ds *:*
> >
> > Active Connections (in computer w2005)
> >
> > Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
> > TCP w2005:epmap w2005:0 LISTENING
> > TCP w2005:microsoft-ds w2005:0 LISTENING
> > TCP w2005:1025 w2005:0 LISTENING
> > TCP w2005:1026 w2005:0 LISTENING
> > TCP w2005:10110 w2005:0 LISTENING
> > UDP w2005:microsoft-ds *:*
> > UDP w2005:isakmp *:*
> >
> > Patrick
>
> try the "-n" flag on the netstat command line. That'll show you the IP
> addresses instead of the names, which might give you the clues you need.
> My first guess would be that there's some oddiosity with the DNS.
>
> How many network cards does the machine have?
>
> What operating system are you using?
>
> Chris
> --
> Minimal false-possitive packet matching for complex protocols with Linux
> and IpTables .. http://www.lowth.com/rope
>




Posted by winged on July 22, 2005, 2:58 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Patrick Sullivan wrote:
> Using Win2k on both machines, no NICs, just modems. I'll see what -n says
> tomorrow, thanks.
>
>
>
>>Patrick Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have been trying to figure out why this computer (Jim) has all these
>>>ded.pacbell.net listeners in it. It's my boss's systenm, uses the same
>>>connections I do, same software etc. But mine (w2005) looks more normal.
>>>TIA!
>>>
>>>Active Connections (in computer Jim)
>>>
>>> Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
>>> TCP jim:epmap ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP jim:microsoft-ds ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP jim:1025 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP jim:1026 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP jim:10110 ded.pacbell.net:0 LISTENING
>>> UDP jim:microsoft-ds *:*
>>>
>>>Active Connections (in computer w2005)
>>>
>>> Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
>>> TCP w2005:epmap w2005:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP w2005:microsoft-ds w2005:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP w2005:1025 w2005:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP w2005:1026 w2005:0 LISTENING
>>> TCP w2005:10110 w2005:0 LISTENING
>>> UDP w2005:microsoft-ds *:*
>>> UDP w2005:isakmp *:*
>>>
>>>Patrick
>>
>>try the "-n" flag on the netstat command line. That'll show you the IP
>>addresses instead of the names, which might give you the clues you need.
>>My first guess would be that there's some oddiosity with the DNS.
>>
>>How many network cards does the machine have?
>>
>>What operating system are you using?
>>
>>Chris
>>--
>>Minimal false-possitive packet matching for complex protocols with Linux
>>and IpTables .. http://www.lowth.com/rope
>>
>
>
>
I would think of potential ms rpc compromise though i can't be sure from
what's provided. Are these machines going through a common firewall or
is w2005 (your maachine) using boss machine as a network gateway?

I must be tired to ask the question...
winged


Similar ThreadsPosted
Which of these netstat connections should be banned on WinXP? March 23, 2006, 2:57 am
Re: Win2k Netstat sockets interpretation January 29, 2007, 6:20 am
BHO Question September 22, 2005, 8:11 am
VPN question February 19, 2006, 8:49 am
SSL question May 5, 2006, 6:41 am
Wi-fi question June 1, 2006, 4:51 am
AVG question July 26, 2006, 7:08 am
Router question June 23, 2005, 3:41 am
Backup question June 28, 2005, 8:46 am
BearShare question August 12, 2005, 8:15 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy