|
Posted by warf on December 14, 2006, 10:23 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
>>On 29 Nov 2006 00:02:20 -0800, phwashington@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>My company wants is thinking about using gmail for there mail service.
>>>I remember that a couple of years ago there was an exploit against
>>>gmail, but since then I haven't been aware of any problems.
>>>Is gmail any less secure than most ISP's.
>>>Is there evidence of this, a series of exploits in the last 2 years
>>>that I haven't heard of.
>>
>>You can get a domain name with hosting with 50 email addresses and
>>several gigabytes of server space for under $10 month. No legitimate
>>company should be using a free email service, in these times. Just my
>>opinion. If your company has over 50 employees, you certainly
>>shouldn't be considering a free service.
>
>
> IMHO, there's nothing special about free that should automatically
> remove it from any consideration.
>
> You should look at the various issues involved:
>
> - reliability of service
> - quality of support
> - ability to meet your needs
> - ability to carry _your_ brand
> - cost
>
> and make the best overall purchasing decision. Certainly, I don't see
> how a $10/month service with poor reliability is somehow better than a
> free service with high reliability, other things being equal.
>
> Craig
>
Gmail does demand enabling 3rd party cookies sans privacy policy and
active-X before you can even log in...may or may not matter to you...
warf.
| 
XML site map