Whole OS encryption

Whole OS encryption

Secure Home | Search | About
 Computer Software Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Whole OS encryption box_750 04-28-2006
Posted by box_750 on April 28, 2006, 6:04 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


I am considering whole OS encryption as this seems to me the safest
choice. I use Windows XP Home and the idea is that everytime I switch on
the computer a password will be asked and the operating system with its
contents decrypted on switching it off the whole OS will be encrypted
again, and if the OS crashes it will encrypt too.

I have found two companies that offer this service Safeboot
http://www.safeboot.com and Securestar http://www.securestar.com but I
have absolutly no experience with this although I have been using virtual
encrypted disks for a long time (i.e. Truecrypt,Bestcrypt,Steganos).

The idea of encrypting the whole OS seems very smart to me as it saves
times and in my view it makes it harder to get into as virtually
everything is encrypted, I wanted to know the oppinion of the experts...

Two things I am concerned with:

1) Algorythm used to make the encryption, I do not want to use a close
source or untested algothym I will only feel comfortable with
AES,Blowfish,Twofish or something like that. I think it is what
professional cryptographers always reccomend.

2) Perfomance of the encrypted OS under normal circumstances,
email,internet,openoffice,pdf.

If anybody has used Securestar or Safeboot please let me know who it went.
Thanks.

Posted by Gerard Bok on April 28, 2006, 8:00 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>I am considering whole OS encryption as this seems to me the safest
>choice.

>The idea of encrypting the whole OS seems very smart to me as it saves
>times and in my view it makes it harder to get into as virtually
>everything is encrypted, I wanted to know the oppinion of the experts...

A far more practical approach would be to use the ATA password
protection that is already available in modern PC's.
(Especially notebooks).

--
Kind regards,
Gerard Bok

Posted by nemo_outis on April 28, 2006, 10:40 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
bok118@zonnet.nl (Gerard Bok) wrote in news:4452032e.12201981
@News.Individual.NET:

>
>
>>I am considering whole OS encryption as this seems to me the safest
>>choice.
>
>>The idea of encrypting the whole OS seems very smart to me as it saves
>>times and in my view it makes it harder to get into as virtually
>>everything is encrypted, I wanted to know the oppinion of the experts...
>
> A far more practical approach would be to use the ATA password
> protection that is already available in modern PC's.
> (Especially notebooks).
>



It's not very convenient if your BIOS doesn't support it (most don't). And
while the system may be adequately secure for some purposes it is a near
certainty that LEOs could obtain a backdoor look at the password from the
HD manufacturer.

Regards,


Posted by ~David~ on April 30, 2006, 12:16 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Gerard Bok wrote:
>
>> I am considering whole OS encryption as this seems to me the safest
>> choice.
>
>> The idea of encrypting the whole OS seems very smart to me as it saves
>> times and in my view it makes it harder to get into as virtually
>> everything is encrypted, I wanted to know the oppinion of the experts...
>
While whole disk encryption is nice if done right, unless you want to pay for a
commercial program like PGP wholedisk, it is not always easy and safe, in terms
of data loss potential. As others have pointed out, a container solution for
sensitive data, like TrueCrypt or similar mechanisms may be easier and more
useful, as why do you need to really encrypt the windows directory or the entire
program files directory. And while your choice of algorithms like AES or
blowfish is tops, the reality is if someone wants to get to your data, the
easiest route is usually through flaws in the encryption software, OS, keyboard
loggers, or some other "mundane" route, not by trying to crack the encryption
key.

That said, I use loop-aes on linux to encrypt the entire partition; it took
about 1.5 hours to encrypt the partition (3 ghz P4, AES-256, 8 gig partition),
several hours to set the whole thing up, and this was after a few unsuccessful
tries that took a few hours each.

~David~

Posted by nemo_outis on April 28, 2006, 10:37 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>
>
> I am considering whole OS encryption as this seems to me the safest
> choice. I use Windows XP Home and the idea is that everytime I switch
> on the computer a password will be asked and the operating system
> with its contents decrypted on switching it off the whole OS will be
> encrypted again, and if the OS crashes it will encrypt too.
>
> I have found two companies that offer this service Safeboot
> http://www.safeboot.com and Securestar http://www.securestar.com but I
> have absolutly no experience with this although I have been using
> virtual encrypted disks for a long time (i.e.
> Truecrypt,Bestcrypt,Steganos).
>
> The idea of encrypting the whole OS seems very smart to me as it saves
> times and in my view it makes it harder to get into as virtually
> everything is encrypted, I wanted to know the oppinion of the
> experts...
>
> Two things I am concerned with:
>
> 1) Algorythm used to make the encryption, I do not want to use a close
> source or untested algothym I will only feel comfortable with
> AES,Blowfish,Twofish or something like that. I think it is what
> professional cryptographers always reccomend.
>
> 2) Perfomance of the encrypted OS under normal circumstances,
> email,internet,openoffice,pdf.
>
> If anybody has used Securestar or Safeboot please let me know who it
> went. Thanks.
>



First of all, let me expand your list of possible candidates:

PGP Wholedisk (alone, as part of a suite, single-machine or enterprise)
http://www.pgp.com/products/wholediskencryption/pgp_whole_disk_profession
als.html

FREE Compusec (yes, it's really free and it works fine - there's also a
fancier $ version that supports hardware tokens)
http://www.ce-infosys.com.sg/CeiNews_FREECompuSec.asp

Drivecrypt plus pack (there's also an enterprise version)
http://www.securstar.com/products_drivecryptpp.php

Utimaco Safeguard Easy (and enterprise versions, etc.)
http://www.utimaco.com/C12570CF0030C00A/CurrentBaseLink/W26K9K5M068OBELUS

Winmagic's SecureDoc (and enterprise, etc.)
http://www.winmagic.com/product_info/securedoc/prod_info.asp

Safeboot Solo - no longer marketed! (and various Enterprise versions,
etc.)
http://www.safeboot.com/products/device-encryption/pc/

Browsing these sites will inform you that these all support mainstream
encryption algorithms (AES, etc.)

I have a mix of legit and bootleg copies of Utimaco, Safeboot,
Drivecrypt, Compusec, and PGP Wholedisk and all have worked
satisfactorily (actually I haven't yet experimented with Wholedisk) with
no noticeable slowdown of the machine (I haven't measured it but I'd
guess less than 10%). I currently use a legit copy of Safeboot Solo
(more from familiarity and habit rather than any strong advantages it may
possess).

Regards,









Similar ThreadsPosted
HDD encryption July 7, 2005, 3:37 pm
international encryption December 3, 2005, 10:28 pm
Encryption for Powerpoint? May 19, 2006, 11:32 pm
Search Encryption June 10, 2006, 11:28 am
Testing SSL encryption September 1, 2006, 8:06 am
Two encryption questions October 7, 2006, 6:07 am
Winzip and encryption on XP November 2, 2006, 8:37 pm
need an encryption plan... December 25, 2006, 3:50 am
Encryption software for XP? November 20, 2008, 2:32 pm
Simple e-mail encryption. July 12, 2005, 1:17 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy