|
Posted by donnie on March 25, 2006, 8:18 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:53:52 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
>
>
>| ####################################
>| Yes, it was a private address because that was the local address
>| 'listening' on port 139, which is ok as long as file and print sharing
>| isn't enabled.
>
>Right. But if it is behind a NAT Router or a NAT Router with a FireWall
implementation then
>having File & Print Services enabled is NOT a problem.
############################################
That's not true if there is a wireless router w/ DHCP and someone w/ a
laptop parks outside your residence or office. I'm sure you have
heard of war driving.
| 
XML site map