VPN and Net storage . . .

VPN and Net storage . . .

Secure Home | Search | About
 Computer Software Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
VPN and Net storage . . . John Hyde 07-28-2006
Posted by John Hyde on July 28, 2006, 8:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I posted this question to comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc, but that
NG seems sleepy. Since it is at lease 1/2 on topic, I thought I'd try
here.

Two basic parts of the question.

First topic is just basic to how a VPN would work. I get the idea on a
client server network, but the nets in this question are peer networks.

If I have a VPN router in my office, and an identical one at home, allow
them to open a tunnel, and both networks have the same windows workgroup
name, does it just look like one big workgroup? In other words, sitting
at my desk I'd be able to see all the computers, printers etc on the
home network from the office and vice versa? I assume that's how it
should work, but would like to confirm before I spend the money because
the real reason to do it is the second topic below.

Also, if setting up this sort of VPN, anyone know of pointers I should
look for? Potential problems? The office router is already in place and
is a LinkSys BEFSX41. The office network is DSL with a static IP, the
home is Comcast and I understand it is a "persistent" IP. My assumption
is that the home router should initiate the connection each time since
it's address could potentially "move."

Second topic: My plan was to use the VPN for offsite backups of office
data. It's not something I'm doing now and need to. If the VPN works
as I think it should, I will get a Network Attached Storage (Like a
Netgear SC101). Due to bandwidth limitations, I would first configure
it plugged directly into the office network and do the complete backups
needed. Then I would take it home, put it in it's "permanent" location
and set everyone up for incremental backups only. Since the NAS is
easily portable, It could be transported back and forth if needed for
another full backup.

Anyone have any experience with this? Any problem areas I should look
for? All thoughts appreciated.

John

Posted by Jim Watt on July 29, 2006, 4:48 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wrote:

Not really a security question at all.

>If I have a VPN router in my office, and an identical one at home, allow
>them to open a tunnel, and both networks have the same windows workgroup
>name, does it just look like one big workgroup?

Yes and no.

You will be able to connect to devices by their IP but not necessarily
to 'see' them by name. It helps is you install a WINS server to map
the names to the IP, That can run on an existing server.

>Also, if setting up this sort of VPN, anyone know of pointers I should
>look for? Potential problems? The office router is already in place and
>is a LinkSys BEFSX41. The office network is DSL with a static IP, the
>home is Comcast and I understand it is a "persistent" IP. My assumption
>is that the home router should initiate the connection each time since
>it's address could potentially "move."

Its important for both, you could investigate using a dynamic IP
service to map a name to your router.

>Second topic: My plan was to use the VPN for offsite backups of office
>data.

Yes, but It depends on the volume of data that needs to be backed
up on a daily basis, and the speed of your connection.

Apart from speed there is no difference to doing a backup over the
office network In my case walking home with a DVD is several orders
of magnitude higher than any electronic transfer

--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Posted by John Hyde on July 29, 2006, 4:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 7/29/2006 1:48 AM, Jim Watt wrote:
> wrote:
>
> Not really a security question at all.
>
>> If I have a VPN router in my office, and an identical one at home, allow
>> them to open a tunnel, and both networks have the same windows workgroup
>> name, does it just look like one big workgroup?
>
> Yes and no.
>
> You will be able to connect to devices by their IP but not necessarily
> to 'see' them by name.

I Assume that means the private IP address? Do both networks need to be
using the same subnet? Right now the office maps addresses as
192.168.168.x while home is 192.168.0.x It's easy enough to change
(Especially since all but one of the home addresses are DHCP assigned)

It helps is you install a WINS server to map
> the names to the IP, That can run on an existing server.

Yeah, but there is no "Server" Just a bunch of XP boxes operating as peers.

If everyone is on the same subnet, but for example, the office is
assigned x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.50 and the home is x.x.x.51 to x.x.x.100,
could an XP box on the office "map a network drive" at say x.x.x.55?

(I envision the "Assignments" to be by making sure the static IPs are in
the correct range and limitations on the the DHCP server in the routers.
Subnet mask for both to be 255.255.255.0)

>
>> Also, if setting up this sort of VPN, anyone know of pointers I should
>> look for? Potential problems? The office router is already in place and
>> is a LinkSys BEFSX41. The office network is DSL with a static IP, the
>> home is Comcast and I understand it is a "persistent" IP. My assumption
>> is that the home router should initiate the connection each time since
>> it's address could potentially "move."
>
> Its important for both, you could investigate using a dynamic IP
> service to map a name to your router.

I thought of that, but can't the router with the static IP just wait to
be contacted by the router that can correctly I.D. itself and the home
router automatically contact if there is a disconnect? I thought I had
to assign one to initiate the contact and the other to listen. I suppose
I get additional security if the "listener" will only accept a
connection attempt from the correct domain. But is there more than that?

>
>> Second topic: My plan was to use the VPN for offsite backups of office
>> data.
>
> Yes, but It depends on the volume of data that needs to be backed
> up on a daily basis, and the speed of your connection.

Well, speed is definitly the issue, I'm still investigating how fast the
office net's upload speed is. But the daily increments would be in the
10 < x < 100 mb range. Definitly not on the GB range.

>
> Apart from speed there is no difference to doing a backup over the
> office network In my case walking home with a DVD is several orders
> of magnitude higher than any electronic transfer

Right, sneekernet is the current system. The big problem is getting it
done given the routine craziness at the office.
>
> --
> Jim Watt
> http://www.gibnet.com

Posted by Jim Watt on July 29, 2006, 4:19 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wrote:

>I Assume that means the private IP address? Do both networks need to be
> using the same subnet? Right now the office maps addresses as
>192.168.168.x while home is 192.168.0.x It's easy enough to change
>(Especially since all but one of the home addresses are DHCP assigned)

They need to be on different subnets, so the private IP addresses
shown above are OK however, somewhere in the router setup
which you will have to figure out you need to tell the routers the
WAN side IP of routeer thats accepting the call.


>It helps is you install a WINS server to map
>> the names to the IP, That can run on an existing server.
>
>Yeah, but there is no "Server" Just a bunch of XP boxes operating as peers.

The unless you can get one to run a WINS server you will need to
refer to machines at the remote end by IP addresses, or use static
IP's and set up the hosts file.

>If everyone is on the same subnet, but for example, the office is
>assigned x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.50 and the home is x.x.x.51 to x.x.x.100,
>could an XP box on the office "map a network drive" at say x.x.x.55?

It won't work that way because the router decides where to send the
traffic depending on the address, so it need to be another block.

>I thought of that, but can't the router with the static IP just wait to
>be contacted by the router that can correctly I.D. itself and the home
>router automatically contact if there is a disconnect? I thought I had
>to assign one to initiate the contact and the other to listen. I suppose
>I get additional security if the "listener" will only accept a
>connection attempt from the correct domain. But is there more than that?

A lot of that depends on your router, best thing is to try it and see.

It took me a morning to figure out how to do it and get a link up
for a local client, thankfully its worked since.

>Well, speed is definitly the issue, I'm still investigating how fast the
>office net's upload speed is. But the daily increments would be in the
>10 < x < 100 mb range. Definitly not on the GB range.

10 is reasonable 100 might be pushing it, again a lot depends on the
speed. Here we have 256Kb upload max.

Although you can run it all night, remember its going to cost you
electricity to run 24x7 and running the ADSL at full whack is not
going to allow you to do much else concurrently.
--
Jim Watt
http://www.gibnet.com

Similar ThreadsPosted
secure password storage manager January 26, 2006, 3:02 am
http://agentdq.t35.com/ - virus storage February 26, 2006, 10:42 am
New product for secure data storage & email March 12, 2006, 12:43 pm
'Trusted Storage' Spec Will Encrypt Hard Drives - from ExtremeTech February 13, 2006, 10:03 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy