|
Posted by TwistyCreek on September 1, 2006, 2:43 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
A great example of how a thing can be reported in "mainstream" news but
still be worse than useless. And a good discussion of how "false sense
of security" sucks in a big way.
Here's the "cover your tracks" web browsing utility as trumpeted by a
couple major computer rags...
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9002864&source=NLT_SEC&nlid=38
http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/30/HNwebfootprints_1.html
Here's Bruce Schneier's blog entry regarding Browzar...
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/09/new_anonymous_b.html
A couple links to how this doesn't work even as advertised from the
above blog...
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ANewPrivateBrowserIMeanBrowzarDoesNotWorkAsAdvertised.aspx
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Sep/0001.html
| 
XML site map