|
Posted by on December 30, 2005, 11:55 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Appreciate any comments/suggestions/pointers to the following security
> risk classification system:
>
> (Did google, but could not find the ones meet my needs :-(
>
> Criticial - If an attack hits the target or an target is compromised,
> the intruder could use the compromised target to springboard to/attack
> other systems, e.g., password, some worms, or the classified
> information/data disclosed to unauthorized parties.
>
> High - 1) If an attack hits the target, the compromised target will
> stop functioning/malfunctioning, e.g., denial of service, but would not
> attack/spread to other systems. 2) "weak" password policy, 3) no
> security agreement with extranet connections with 3rd parties.
>
> Medium - 1) Lack of such implementations makes forensic / auditing
> activities impossible. 2) If an attack hits the target, the compromised
> target will sloooow down.
>
> Low - User's security awareness training
>
> Warning - Lack of implementation of "some best practice", for lack of
> better words, e.g., warning message prior anyone to log on.
>
> Any commens/suggestions/pointers are appreciated.
It is totally unclear to me on what basis you ordered these. Also, it is
not at all clear whether you are talking about specific attacks (cf.
'worms' in the description of critical problems) or vulnerabilities.
For instance, if I look at 'critical' and 'high', I could think you are
talking about what hosts to secure first. But 'medium' is clearly about
something entirely different. Also, it essentially repeats the denial of
service already mentioned under 'high'.
Also, users' security awareness training is one of the most important
aspects, as desktop computers usually provide very easy entrance points
into the organisation. And while they may not be very useful in
compromising the servers, it is typically quite possible to get a good
chunk of data off the servers.
There have been numerous, mostly inconclusive, attempts at a
classification system over the years. You may wish to search the
Full-Disclosure archives at lists.grok.org.uk.
Joachim
|