Charity site payments - secure or not ?

Charity site payments - secure or not ?

Secure Home | Search | About
 Computer Software Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Charity site payments - secure or not ? Kev 04-01-2006
Posted by Kev on April 1, 2006, 4:13 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I wanted to donate to a well established and reputable charity using a
credit card. I'll not mention the name of the organisation for obvious
reasons.

The problem seems to be that although there is a VeriSign logo on the pages,
the connection in both IE6 and FireFox 1.5 seems to be a pure HTTP
connection and not an HTTPS one. This is reflected in the address bar and
there is no padlock.

This is true on the page where you enter the amount and also on the page
where you enter the actual card details.

As far as I can tell, this means that the card details would be routed
across the internet in an unencrypted format.

I've raised this with the organisation who passed it onto the hosting
company. This is what they had to say :

"There are multiple ways to donate as instructed on the page. You can send
him an email back saying your web hosting company, XXXXXXXXX, does not host
Verisign's online forms. That first page is on our servers (he mentions
http://www.xxxxxxxxx.org/donate.html ), after that it goes to VeriSign. If
he would place an amount in and continue, he would know. We can add some
text that says something along these lines. Please let me know."

If you enter an amount and click the Donate button it takes you to the
payment page - which is not showing as HTTPS. Clicking on the VeriSign logo
shows the following text :

"Encrypted Data Transmission This Web site can secure your private
information using a VeriSign SSL Certificate. Information exchanged with any
address beginning with https is encrypted using SSL before transmission.
Identity Verified VERISIGN, INC. has been verified as the owner or
operator of the Web site located at payments.verisign.com. Official records
confirm VERISIGN, INC. as a valid business."

What does anyone think about this ? You reasoning would be good to see as I
intend to pass the comments back to the organisation.

Thanks



Posted by Adam W. Montville on April 1, 2006, 11:55 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Kev wrote:
> I wanted to donate to a well established and reputable charity using a
> credit card. I'll not mention the name of the organisation for obvious
> reasons.
>
> The problem seems to be that although there is a VeriSign logo on the pages,
> the connection in both IE6 and FireFox 1.5 seems to be a pure HTTP
> connection and not an HTTPS one. This is reflected in the address bar and
> there is no padlock.

You picked up on the first hint that the page isn't secure.

>
> This is true on the page where you enter the amount and also on the page
> where you enter the actual card details.

Again, this is a big clue. Don't enter your information on these sites.
The charity (or any organization) needs to ensure that the site is
communicating to you that it's secure.

>
> As far as I can tell, this means that the card details would be routed
> across the internet in an unencrypted format.

That's a perfect assumption.

>
> I've raised this with the organisation who passed it onto the hosting
> company. This is what they had to say :
>
> "There are multiple ways to donate as instructed on the page. You can send
> him an email back saying your web hosting company, XXXXXXXXX, does not host
> Verisign's online forms. That first page is on our servers (he mentions
> http://www.xxxxxxxxx.org/donate.html ), after that it goes to VeriSign. If
> he would place an amount in and continue, he would know. We can add some
> text that says something along these lines. Please let me know."

This arrangement does not make for good security. We security
professionals are trying to raise Information Security awareness and
when service providers come up with a solution that counters our
efforts, we all lose.

The proper way to implement this solution is to have the information
gathering page be secured -- the form itself, not just the submission of
the form.

This sort of thing is really starting to be a problem. There are still
banks who send out legitimate e-mails requesting users to click on a
link. This is what makes phishers successful -- legitimate companies
legitimizing a method of usability that the bad guy can then exploit.

>
> If you enter an amount and click the Donate button it takes you to the
> payment page - which is not showing as HTTPS. Clicking on the VeriSign logo
> shows the following text :
>
> "Encrypted Data Transmission This Web site can secure your private
> information using a VeriSign SSL Certificate. Information exchanged with any
> address beginning with https is encrypted using SSL before transmission.
> Identity Verified VERISIGN, INC. has been verified as the owner or
> operator of the Web site located at payments.verisign.com. Official records
> confirm VERISIGN, INC. as a valid business."

It sounds like they've got implementation problems.
>
> What does anyone think about this ? You reasoning would be good to see as I
> intend to pass the comments back to the organisation.
>
> Thanks
>
>

I think you've answered your own question. If you still want to donate
to the company, do so in the old fashioned way -- pay by check via snail
mail.

--
*Adam W. Montville, CISSP*
*http://www.MontvilleArchives.net <http://www.MontvilleArchives.net>*

*ICQ: 271-685-874*

Posted by Kev on April 1, 2006, 1:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
<snip>

Thanks Adam. We clearly agree on this.

Now I can tell the organisation that I'm not a lone voice and that despite
what the hosting company has advised, several people have the view that the
card payments are indeed insecure.

Would anyone else care to comment ?

Thanks



Posted by Craig A. Finseth on April 3, 2006, 7:59 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
        ...
>The problem seems to be that although there is a VeriSign logo on the pages,
>the connection in both IE6 and FireFox 1.5 seems to be a pure HTTP
>connection and not an HTTPS one. This is reflected in the address bar and
>there is no padlock.
        ...
>What does anyone think about this ? You reasoning would be good to see as I
>intend to pass the comments back to the organisation.

You are correct: the session isn't encrypted.

So, assuming that you are on dialup or DSL, this means that you aren't
protected in the _least_ likely place to expose your information. If
you are on cable, using wireless, or coming in from a public place,
this is somewhat more exposure here.

The real place to worry is in the charity's database and backend
processors. These are much more tempting targets and much more likely
to be implemented in an insecure fashion. They are also the same
systems that are used no matter how you make the donations. (:-(

You can always send them a check.

Craig


Posted by Adam W. Montville on April 3, 2006, 10:40 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Craig A. Finseth wrote:
>         ...
>> The problem seems to be that although there is a VeriSign logo on the pages,
>> the connection in both IE6 and FireFox 1.5 seems to be a pure HTTP
>> connection and not an HTTPS one. This is reflected in the address bar and
>> there is no padlock.
>         ...
>> What does anyone think about this ? You reasoning would be good to see as I
>> intend to pass the comments back to the organisation.
>
> You are correct: the session isn't encrypted.
>
> So, assuming that you are on dialup or DSL, this means that you aren't
> protected in the _least_ likely place to expose your information. If
> you are on cable, using wireless, or coming in from a public place,
> this is somewhat more exposure here.
>
> The real place to worry is in the charity's database and backend
> processors. These are much more tempting targets and much more likely
> to be implemented in an insecure fashion. They are also the same
> systems that are used no matter how you make the donations. (:-(
>
> You can always send them a check.
>
> Craig
>

Kev, Craig makes a great point!

--
*Adam W. Montville, CISSP*
*http://www.MontvilleArchives.net <http://www.MontvilleArchives.net>*

*ICQ: 271-685-874*

Similar ThreadsPosted
Advice needed on secure remote datacenter and secure communication August 24, 2008, 8:36 pm
Secure Auditor secure your windows April 28, 2008, 6:24 am
Hacking site! July 14, 2005, 12:14 pm
suspicious site January 23, 2008, 7:20 pm
Cross Site Scripting for .exe? June 6, 2005, 12:45 pm
US Gov looking for input about IE ONLY pre-patient web site... August 13, 2005, 11:57 pm
how to allow different companies to use a site without logging in? November 21, 2005, 1:55 pm
Funniest site name ever www.niggersandcrackers.com February 8, 2006, 3:26 pm
New Security site released May 12, 2008, 7:15 am
Please check the security hole of this site October 4, 2005, 2:02 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy