Sygate doesn't seem to be updating anymore

Sygate doesn't seem to be updating anymore

Secure Home | Search | About
 Anti-Virus Software    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Sygate doesn't seem to be updating anymore louise 12-12-2005
Posted by louise on December 12, 2005, 1:10 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
since Sygate does not seem to be updating anymore --
purchased by Symantec -- I'm beginning to feel the need to
do something else.

Win XP Pro
Linksys wired router
NOD32
Firefox about 60% of the time and IE, the rest of the time.
Outlook for e-mail

I run Adaware, Spybot and Spydoctor on demand - I don't
leave any of them running.

So what will replace Sygate and is not about to fold or be
purchased and included in some suite? I would really like
to be able to continue to use the best of each category for
my security.because of my use of speech recognition
software, I would like to conserve resources as much as
possible.

I've read the suggestion that the XP firewall be turned on
and BoClean be run. Is this a reasonable solution? Or,
what are some other options?

TIA

Louise

Posted by optikl on December 12, 2005, 8:37 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
louise wrote:
> since Sygate does not seem to be updating anymore -- purchased by
> Symantec -- I'm beginning to feel the need to do something else.
>
> Win XP Pro
> Linksys wired router
> NOD32
> Firefox about 60% of the time and IE, the rest of the time.
> Outlook for e-mail
>
> I run Adaware, Spybot and Spydoctor on demand - I don't leave any of
> them running.
>
> So what will replace Sygate and is not about to fold or be purchased and
> included in some suite? I would really like to be able to continue to
> use the best of each category for my security.because of my use of
> speech recognition software, I would like to conserve resources as much
> as possible.
>
> I've read the suggestion that the XP firewall be turned on and BoClean
> be run. Is this a reasonable solution? Or, what are some other options?
>
> TIA
>
> Louise

The new version of BOClean (4.20) uses a truckload of CPU at startup and
during periodic memory scans. If can live with that, then BOClean is a
reasonably sound choice for on-access file scanning. But, from the looks
of what you got, surely with NOD32 and working behind a Linksys router,
you have plenty of security (unless of course you have a huge on-line
Porn appetite). You know that you can set security policies within XP
Pro to further harden your system against intrusion. Finally, if you're
worried about unauthorized applications somehow making their way on to
your system and fouling your registry and startup files, get something
like WinPatrol. With the setup you've got, you don't *need* any software
firewall replacements, unless you have a burning desire to waste your
money. If you do, contribute it to a politician.

Posted by Art on December 12, 2005, 8:44 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>since Sygate does not seem to be updating anymore --
>purchased by Symantec -- I'm beginning to feel the need to
>do something else.
>
>Win XP Pro
>Linksys wired router
>NOD32
>Firefox about 60% of the time and IE, the rest of the time.
>Outlook for e-mail
>
>I run Adaware, Spybot and Spydoctor on demand - I don't
>leave any of them running.
>
>So what will replace Sygate and is not about to fold or be
>purchased and included in some suite? I would really like
>to be able to continue to use the best of each category for
>my security.because of my use of speech recognition
>software, I would like to conserve resources as much as
>possible.
>
>I've read the suggestion that the XP firewall be turned on
>and BoClean be run. Is this a reasonable solution? Or,
>what are some other options?

Are you saying that your Linksys doesn't provide you with
a firewall function? What is the model #?

Assuming that you already have a router/firewall, a software
firewall has nothing to do insofar as blocking unrequested
incoming packets. So in that case, enabling the XP firewall
accomplishes nothing since it only blocks incoming.

Some people like third party software firewalls such as Sygate
because they have the capability of permitting only authorized apps to
access the internet. There is controversy on this since they are easy
for malware to circumvent and/or disable. So if you are hit by certain
malwares, the software firewall (and maybe antivirus) is useless.
OTOH, not all malware and spyware do this, so in some cases the
software firewalls have been useful in alerting users to
malware/spyware.

If it gives you the warm fuzzies to use a software firewall, you might
ask for opinions in a firewall newsgroup. ZA and Outpost are still
available, I suppose. Personally, I plan to hang on to Sygate since
I like its traffic log. However, I rarely use it since I have a
router/firewall and have closed all ports besides :)

Art

http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg


Posted by louise on December 12, 2005, 11:17 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Art wrote:
>
>
>>since Sygate does not seem to be updating anymore --
>>purchased by Symantec -- I'm beginning to feel the need to
>>do something else.
>>
>>Win XP Pro
>>Linksys wired router
>>NOD32
>>Firefox about 60% of the time and IE, the rest of the time.
>>Outlook for e-mail
>>
>>I run Adaware, Spybot and Spydoctor on demand - I don't
>>leave any of them running.
>>
>>So what will replace Sygate and is not about to fold or be
>>purchased and included in some suite? I would really like
>>to be able to continue to use the best of each category for
>>my security.because of my use of speech recognition
>>software, I would like to conserve resources as much as
>>possible.
>>
>>I've read the suggestion that the XP firewall be turned on
>>and BoClean be run. Is this a reasonable solution? Or,
>>what are some other options?
>
>
> Are you saying that your Linksys doesn't provide you with
> a firewall function? What is the model #?
>
> Assuming that you already have a router/firewall, a software
> firewall has nothing to do insofar as blocking unrequested
> incoming packets. So in that case, enabling the XP firewall
> accomplishes nothing since it only blocks incoming.
>
> Some people like third party software firewalls such as Sygate
> because they have the capability of permitting only authorized apps to
> access the internet. There is controversy on this since they are easy
> for malware to circumvent and/or disable. So if you are hit by certain
> malwares, the software firewall (and maybe antivirus) is useless.
> OTOH, not all malware and spyware do this, so in some cases the
> software firewalls have been useful in alerting users to
> malware/spyware.
>
> If it gives you the warm fuzzies to use a software firewall, you might
> ask for opinions in a firewall newsgroup. ZA and Outpost are still
> available, I suppose. Personally, I plan to hang on to Sygate since
> I like its traffic log. However, I rarely use it since I have a
> router/firewall and have closed all ports besides :)
>
> Art
>
> http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
>
Thanks for your response. My Linksys is a 3 year old
BEFSR41. I believe it does have an NAT built in. Is that
correct?

I don't want "warm fuzzies" at the price of using resources,
sofware conflicts, and all that goes with excessive use of
supposed safeguards. For this reason, I leave none of the
spyware programs running and only use them periodically, on
demand.

Since BoClean takes a big bite out of resources, I'm much
less inclined toward it.

I gather I should just leave the old Sygate running and not
worry about it?

TIA

Louise

Posted by David H. Lipman on December 12, 2005, 11:29 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


>>
>> Are you saying that your Linksys doesn't provide you with
>> a firewall function? What is the model #?
>>
>> Assuming that you already have a router/firewall, a software
>> firewall has nothing to do insofar as blocking unrequested
>> incoming packets. So in that case, enabling the XP firewall
>> accomplishes nothing since it only blocks incoming.
>>
>> Some people like third party software firewalls such as Sygate
>> because they have the capability of permitting only authorized apps to
>> access the internet. There is controversy on this since they are easy
>> for malware to circumvent and/or disable. So if you are hit by certain
>> malwares, the software firewall (and maybe antivirus) is useless.
>> OTOH, not all malware and spyware do this, so in some cases the
>> software firewalls have been useful in alerting users to
>> malware/spyware.
>>
>> If it gives you the warm fuzzies to use a software firewall, you might
>> ask for opinions in a firewall newsgroup. ZA and Outpost are still
>> available, I suppose. Personally, I plan to hang on to Sygate since
>> I like its traffic log. However, I rarely use it since I have a
>> router/firewall and have closed all ports besides :)
>>
>> Art
>>
>> http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
>>
| Thanks for your response. My Linksys is a 3 year old
| BEFSR41. I believe it does have an NAT built in. Is that
| correct?
|
| I don't want "warm fuzzies" at the price of using resources,
| sofware conflicts, and all that goes with excessive use of
| supposed safeguards. For this reason, I leave none of the
| spyware programs running and only use them periodically, on
| demand.
|
| Since BoClean takes a big bite out of resources, I'm much
| less inclined toward it.
|
| I gather I should just leave the old Sygate running and not
| worry about it?
|
| TIA
|
| Louise

The Linksys BEFSR41 is a NAT Router.
It is NOT a full FireWall implementation but has FireWall constructs.


One powerful construct is port blocking.
{ The following is known for a v2 model a BEFSR41 v3 model may be slightly
different }
Go to the URL http://192.168.1.1/Filters.htm

Find "Filtered Private Port Range" and set the following...

"1:" should be set to "both" then in the first box enter 135 and in the second
box enter
139
"2:" should be set to "both" then in the first box enter 445 and in the second
box enter
445

Depending the model version the following could be on the same URL or a
different URL ...

Enable -- Block WAN Request
Disable -- Remote Management
Disable -- Remote Upgrade


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm



Similar ThreadsPosted
First Sygate, now Kerio September 4, 2005, 6:00 pm
No free AVG anymore. Other alternatives..? January 16, 2007, 3:24 am
trendmicro office scan client update is not working anymore August 18, 2006, 10:36 am
AVG not updating. August 9, 2005, 7:01 pm
Updating AVG September 5, 2007, 11:25 am
avg not updating? December 10, 2008, 12:06 pm
anyone else find KAV isn't auto-updating ? June 7, 2005, 2:58 pm
NOD32 not updating to 20060120 January 22, 2006, 12:58 am
AVG Free offline updating March 18, 2006, 3:18 pm
updating NOD32 problem January 1, 2008, 9:47 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy