|
Posted by Pete on February 2, 2007, 3:40 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
We use NOD32 for NT4.0 and it works well.
> Hello All,
>
> still using F-Prot 3.16f, I'm afraid that we will not renew the
> license this year. F-Prot 3 missed two worms in the last weeks, and
> F-Prot 6 doesn't support NT4 which is still used on some old systems
> here. What a pity, also the volume pricing of F-Prot was very
> attractive (<USD5 per computer).
>
> I don't want any "on access" or Winsock hijacking scanners. I would
> prefer a very basic "on demand" scanner with no frills. And I need a
> command line interface because I want to integrate the scanner for
> example in Pegasus Mail.
>
> F-Prot/Win (with fpcmd) and ClamAV (with clamscan) look like what I
> want, but they don't catch enough malware. In addition, clamscan is
> sloooow.
>
> NOD32 seemed to be interesting but I can't get around some severe
> limitations.
>
> Any recommendations or warnings before I try the next candidate?
>
> TIA,
>
> Oliver
> --
> Oliver Betz, Munich
> despammed.com might be broken, use Reply-To:
|