|
Posted by louise on January 19, 2008, 2:29 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Jean wrote:
>
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> Have you considered a more robust email client? I'd recommend
>>> Thunderbird as the most common alternative product.
>>> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/
>> Yes I heard about the 'fragility' of OE6 and am using now Windows Live
>> Mail (Version 2008), downloaded from
>>
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=ba346005-45f6-4d14-a7dc-51e13d11a950&displaylang=en&tm
>>
>> I like it because it lets me accessing multiple e-mail accounts in one
>> place
>
> OE can do that. <g> So does Thunderbird.
>
>> and hope that this application is and improvement concerning
>> 'fragility'.
>
> Thunderbird does it better.
>
>>>> Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?
>>> Yes. As long as the anti-virus application is running in the
>>> background, it will prevent you from executing any known viruses.
>> Thanks, I am going to disable this function right now.
>
> Good deal.
>
How is this fragility in Outlook? I use Outlook as a PIM
and I'm really quite dependent upon it - and I love those
functions.
I do use Thunderbird for some other email accounts I have -
but my main one remains in Outlook.
Presently using Outlook 2003 - is there anything that should
be done to Outlook to help matters along? I do use NOD32
with the email option enabled, I use a good spam filter and
I'm careful. I know that none of this is anywhere near a
guarantee.
Louise
| 
XML site map