|
Posted by puns on June 24, 2005, 4:34 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Does one have advantages or disadvantages over the other?
|
|
Posted by Art on June 24, 2005, 4:54 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>Does one have advantages or disadvantages over the other?
Of course.
Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
|
|
Posted by Alt Beer on June 24, 2005, 8:47 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Does one have advantages or disadvantages over the other?=20
>=20
>=20
NOD32 for Windows cant clean viruses contained in an archive, it can =
only detect them. =20
The DOS version of NOD32 can clean archives though. The following taken =
from FAQ on the NOD32 site:
NOD32 scanner detected a virus, but the only available option =
is Leave
1.. The virus was detected in an archive.
NOD32 is not capable of taking actions on the files within an archive. =
Therefore, please delete the whole archive manually if it contains only =
the virus, or use the appropriate unpacker such as WinZIP, WinRAR, etc. =
to delete the particular infected file in case the archive contains also =
other non-viral files.
------=_NextPart_000_051E_01C57906.12080F90
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1505" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>"puns" <</FONT><A =
size=3D2>puns@verizon.net</FONT></A><FONT size=3D2>> wrote in message =
</FONT><A=20
size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>> Does one have advantages or disadvantages over =
the other?=20
<BR>> <BR>> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>NOD32 for Windows cant clean viruses contained =
in an=20
archive, it can only detect them. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>The DOS version of NOD32 can clean =
archives though. =20
The following taken from FAQ on the NOD32 site:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT =
size=3D2> =20
<STRONG>NOD32 scanner detected a virus, but the only available option is =
Leave</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<OL>
<LI><FONT size=3D2><STRONG>The virus was detected in an =
archive.<BR>NOD32 is not=20
capable of taking actions on the files within an archive. Therefore, =
please=20
delete the whole archive manually if it contains only the virus, or =
use the=20
appropriate unpacker such as WinZIP, WinRAR, etc. to delete the =
particular=20
infected file in case the archive contains also other non-viral=20
files</STRONG>.<BR></FONT></LI></OL></BODY></HTML>
------=
|
|
Posted by Frode on June 24, 2005, 9:50 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hash: SHA1
puns wrote:
> Does one have advantages or disadvantages over the other?
The major one I feel is worth mentioning, is resource consumption. I trialed
Kaspersky on several boxes a while back and on all of them there was a very
noticeable resource drain. Its scanning engine is aggressive enough to make
mundane tasks such as opening up the start menu or add/remove programs can
take several times longer than usual. The start menu was a bit sporadic
(depending on caching I guess) while add/remove programs was consistent on
all machines. Opening up folders also tended to take quite a while at times,
probably due to KAV scanning files as they were accessed for icon retrieval,
is my guess.
If it hadn't been for that one issue, I would be a KAV owner today. It's a
very nice product if you don't mind/notice the slowdown.
- --
Frode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCvGQRNx8IkioE8tMRAjoRAJ40zsUzM6fXgbuBO1aQZunF1c1JwQCeIq5K
3tfHvWDaTP/WZw48XHigTMc=
=ScxW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Kaspersky or NOD32? | July 30, 2006, 9:22 am |
| NOD32 vs Kaspersky | November 23, 2006, 12:46 pm |
| Re: NOD32 vs Kaspersky | November 25, 2006, 6:42 am |
| Re: NOD32 vs Kaspersky | November 25, 2006, 6:50 am |
| Re: NOD32 vs Kaspersky | November 30, 2006, 5:25 pm |
| kaspersky vs nod32 | December 14, 2007, 7:33 am |
| NOD32, Kaspersky, e-trust, or Avast? | November 24, 2005, 3:50 pm |
| Nod32, Kaspersky,Norton,McAfee,F-Prot,AVG,Avast! Most effective? | September 5, 2005, 10:44 am |
| Kaspersky 6 or BitDefender 9 Internet Security or NOD32+OutPost Pro+Ewido+NetLimiter ? | February 25, 2006, 12:00 pm |
| Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0 and Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 unveiled | May 15, 2006, 8:28 am |
|
XML site map