|
Posted by Leythos on September 5, 2008, 2:05 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Gotde T Shirt wrote:
> > On 04 Sep 2008 02:09:19 -0500, admin@ng2000.com wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=anti-virus
> >>
> >> Humboldt Manufacturing chooses AVG Anti-Virus when "big name" protection
falls short.
> >
> > "... they were running Symantec on their 25 workstations, along with a
> > dedicated Symantec server that was dedicated to providing virus
> > protection," Humrich remembered. "Recent versions of their anti-virus
> > products have been much less reliable, and hog a lot of system resources."
> >
> > No shit, Sherlock. As much a vote against Norton crapware as a vote for
> > AVG.
>
> I love the "recent versions". Who can remember when Symantec was
> reliable and a easy on resources?
In every case, multiple customers, multiple sororities, AVG is the one
company that has provided the lest protection to users. Of all the
systems we see each year, the ones that are compromised are the ones
running AVG, and this has been the same for 3 years.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
| 
XML site map