Best Anti-Spam product?

Best Anti-Spam product?

Secure Home | Search | About
 Anti-Virus Software    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Best Anti-Spam product? Gary Helfert 09-27-2005
Posted by Gary Helfert on September 27, 2005, 6:12 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I've got Norton Internet Security 2005 which is suppose to have a spam
recognition functionality. It isn't working very well. In particular spam
hawking Rolex watches continues to return.
I have read that some spam companies are cutting deals with anti-spam
software venders to keep their garbage off the definitions list.
Any feedback on this problem apprecitated.




Posted by Guillermito on September 27, 2005, 3:15 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
ghelfert@worldnet.att.net says...

>I've got Norton Internet Security 2005 which is suppose to have a spam
>recognition functionality. It isn't working very well. In particular spam
>hawking Rolex watches continues to return.

You cannot define some kind of simple rule with blacklisting all
variations around the string "Rolex" ? It does not appears frequently in
legit email, no ? At least not in mine.

>I have read that some spam companies are cutting deals with anti-spam
>software venders to keep their garbage off the definitions list.

Probably some kind of urban legend. There is much more money to make by
selling efficient software by the millions than by cutting small deals
with spam thugs.

>Any feedback on this problem apprecitated.

I used to use SpamPal on Windows. It's a very well done open source
software that first blacklists spams based on database of known spammer
servers like SpamHaus. Than you can add several plugins to enhance the
efficiency : conditions-based rules, Bayesian filter, white/black list,
etc. It takes some time to tune up, but at the end the combination of all
of these layers were pretty efficient for me. And believe me, I received
huge amounts of spam, for using the same address since 1995. I removed
SpamPal once I switched my main email to Gmail.

So, if you want a simple solution without anything to worry about, use
Gmail. Their spam filter is not bad, and is probably trained by billions
of e-mails, and cooperating users. That's at least the impression that I
have. Maybe other webmails are also good for this, but I don't know.

--
Guillermito
http://www.guillermito2.net



Posted by David H. Lipman on September 27, 2005, 11:57 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

| I've got Norton Internet Security 2005 which is suppose to have a spam
| recognition functionality. It isn't working very well. In particular spam
| hawking Rolex watches continues to return.
| I have read that some spam companies are cutting deals with anti-spam
| software venders to keep their garbage off the definitions list.
| Any feedback on this problem apprecitated.
|

I use Pegasus Mail is my email client. It has its own spam filtration. Between
its Content
Filter and POP3 Filter, I get little spam. BTW, that is in conjunction with
Brightwork's
SpamDetector on the Verizon email server (now a Symantec product).

So in Pegasus Mail I can specifically set a POP3 filter and if it meets the
criteria the
spam is deleted on the server and never downloaded. The content filter will
delete those
that can't be deleted on the server.

You have to examine the header and body of the email and looks for the common
denominator.
I have seen those Rolex spams and they are usually GIF files in the add and are
attached in
the email so you can't filter on the word "rolex". You have to look for the
"common
denominator" in the message and separates the spam from legit email.

If you use a email client like Pegasus Mail in conjunction with a another spam
filer, you
will greatly increase the filtration rate. What Symantec misses, Pegasus can
catch.

Please note that 'spam' is NOT an a.c.a-v On Topic subject matter and you
really need to
post this kind of query in a anti spam News Group.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm




Posted by Gary Helfert on September 29, 2005, 4:47 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I did a search for newsgroups relating to spam and the 3 hits I got looked
like more of a hang out for people creating spam than people with tips on
how to prevent spam.
Can you recommend an anti-spam newgroup?

>
> | I've got Norton Internet Security 2005 which is suppose to have a spam
> | recognition functionality. It isn't working very well. In particular
> spam
> | hawking Rolex watches continues to return.
> | I have read that some spam companies are cutting deals with anti-spam
> | software venders to keep their garbage off the definitions list.
> | Any feedback on this problem apprecitated.
> |
>
> I use Pegasus Mail is my email client. It has its own spam filtration.
> Between its Content
> Filter and POP3 Filter, I get little spam. BTW, that is in conjunction
> with Brightwork's
> SpamDetector on the Verizon email server (now a Symantec product).
>
> So in Pegasus Mail I can specifically set a POP3 filter and if it meets
> the criteria the
> spam is deleted on the server and never downloaded. The content filter
> will delete those
> that can't be deleted on the server.
>
> You have to examine the header and body of the email and looks for the
> common denominator.
> I have seen those Rolex spams and they are usually GIF files in the add
> and are attached in
> the email so you can't filter on the word "rolex". You have to look for
> the "common
> denominator" in the message and separates the spam from legit email.
>
> If you use a email client like Pegasus Mail in conjunction with a another
> spam filer, you
> will greatly increase the filtration rate. What Symantec misses, Pegasus
> can catch.
>
> Please note that 'spam' is NOT an a.c.a-v On Topic subject matter and
> you really need to
> post this kind of query in a anti spam News Group.
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
>
>




Posted by David H. Lipman on September 29, 2005, 12:57 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

| I did a search for newsgroups relating to spam and the 3 hits I got looked
| like more of a hang out for people creating spam than people with tips on
| how to prevent spam.
| Can you recommend an anti-spam newgroup?
|

news.admin.net-abuse.misc


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm




Similar ThreadsPosted
Norton AntiSpam - slow processing of 'This is spam' August 23, 2005, 10:16 am
AVG no longer a free product? November 25, 2006, 11:26 am
My search for a good AV product... May 31, 2007, 4:09 pm
Re: Has anyone ever tried this anti-malware product before? November 25, 2008, 9:31 am
Your Favorite Enterprise Level AV Product May 29, 2007, 4:44 pm
getting tired of time spent choosing an AV product June 9, 2007, 7:38 am
Latest AV product rankings from SRI Malware Threat Center January 4, 2009, 1:29 pm
Re: Latest AV product rankings from SRI Malware Threat Cente January 5, 2009, 9:10 am
Exploit Prevention Labs Updates LinkScanner Safe Surfing Product Line With Support for Vista and Firefox (SYS-CON Media) February 11, 2007, 9:02 am
Exploit Prevention Labs Updates LinkScanner Safe Surfing Product Line With Support for Vista and Firefox (SYS-CON Media) February 11, 2007, 9:02 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy