|
Posted by louise on July 13, 2006, 10:54 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
>> I just accidentally came across your noscript extension for
>> FF and it seems to be working very well.
>>
>> It seems to be working so well, that I'm wondering whether
>> some of my other extensions might now be redundant.
>>
>> So - if one is running noscript, what about the necessity
>> for running: flashblock, and adblock plus?
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts and for your extension.
>
> Hi Louise. As Kurt pointed out, I'm not the author of NoScript.
> I've never used or evaluated AdBlock, and I'm not in a
> position to comment on its possibilities for security enhancement
> as opposed to just annoyance suppression. Actually, I used
> Proxomitron for many years for annoyance suppression, and
> it always worked very well. Lately, I haven't bothered with
> it since I've taken to using Opera as my primary browser,
> and it does well enough without any additional filtering.
>
> Anyway, it seems to me that NoScript is a worthwhile
> security extension for MOZ and FF users, as I discuss in
> my article.
>
> Art
> http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
Thanks for your help. I've been using it for a day and all
seems good. It is a nuisance to configure for sites one
uses but on the other hand, everything seems to be loading a
little faster because of blocking and/or partial blocking.
Louise
| 
XML site map