|
Posted by Sam on August 21, 2005, 6:23 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Is there any point in paying for AVG professional version over using AVG
Free. I know the paid-for version has more flexible testing options,
for example, but is there any "killer" reason why the paid-for version
would be a better bet than the free version?
--
Sam
|
|
Posted by Roger Wilco on August 21, 2005, 7:26 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Is there any point in paying for AVG professional version over using
AVG
> Free. I know the paid-for version has more flexible testing options,
> for example, but is there any "killer" reason why the paid-for version
> would be a better bet than the free version?
It might be the only real difference is the tech support. For instance,
the next time there's an outbreak and the servers they use to make
updates available are overwhelmed (no matter which of the available
lists you use) - those with the paid for version will be eligible for
the option of clogging the tech support lines up too. :))
|
|
Posted by Conor on August 22, 2005, 11:35 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options says...
> Is there any point in paying for AVG professional version over using AVG
> Free. I know the paid-for version has more flexible testing options,
> for example, but is there any "killer" reason why the paid-for version
> would be a better bet than the free version?
>
If you're going to pay for AV, look at NOD32.
--
Conor
If Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened
rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic
music.
|
|
Posted by Sam on August 22, 2005, 7:30 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Conor said ...
> If you're going to pay for AV, look at NOD32.
>
Thanks, I will look, but never the less I am hoping someone will be able
to answer my original question.
--
Sam
|
|
Posted by louise on August 22, 2005, 8:44 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options sam.sam@sam.samsam.com says...
> Conor said ...
> > If you're going to pay for AV, look at NOD32.
> >
> Thanks, I will look, but never the less I am hoping someone will be able
> to answer my original question.
>
I second the kudos for NOD32.
I don't know AVG but before NOD32, I tried Avast. The free version
and the paid version appeared the same until I looked at every item
each covered: the free version did not cover script-blocking while
the paid version did. I suspect there is some similar difference
with AVG.
Louise
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | AVG Free -- where does command come from that says "Scan with AVG Free" in context menu? | June 28, 2007, 11:08 am |
| Any recommendation for free alternative to AVG Free , which now will cost $$ | November 11, 2006, 9:08 am |
| Steps to become spyware and virus free for free!! | November 13, 2007, 2:58 am |
| Free AntiVir vs Free BitDefender | August 30, 2007, 4:31 am |
| AVG Free no longer FREE | November 23, 2006, 8:49 pm |
| AVG 7.5 free vs. BidDefender 8.0 free | February 18, 2007, 1:40 pm |
| AVG Free no longer free ? | December 5, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| Why is AVG free? | August 7, 2005, 1:01 pm |
| Re: Run AVG Free from CD? | March 14, 2006, 4:27 pm |
| Run AVG Free from CD? | March 13, 2006, 4:32 pm |
|